Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Electrophysiological Measurement of Noxious-evoked Brain Activity in Neonates Using a Flat-tip Probe Coupled to Electroencephalography
Published on: November 29, 2017
Blinded randomized crossover trial: Skin-to-skin care vs. sucrose for preterm neonatal pain
Somashekhar Nimbalkar1, Vivek V Shukla2,3, Vishwa Chauhan1
1Pramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Objective:
To compare skin-to-skin care (SSC) and oral sucrose for preterm neonatal pain control.
Methods:
Preterm neonates (28-36 weeks gestation) requiring heel-stick were eligible. In group-A, SSC was given 15-min before first heel-stick, and sucrose was given 2-min before second heel-stick. In group-B, the sequence was reversed. Blinded premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score assessment was done at 0, 1, and 5-min of heel-stick by two assessors.
Results:
A hundred neonates were enrolled. The inter-rater agreement for the PIPP score was good. The behavior state component was significantly lower in the sucrose group at all assessment points. The mean (SD) difference between 1-min and 0 min was similar [SSC 3.58(3.16) vs. sucrose 4.09(3.82), p = 0.24] between groups. The PIPP score attained baseline values at 5-min in both groups.
Conclusion:
Albeit sucrose indicated instantaneous action, SSC and sucrose have comparable clinical efficacy for preterm neonatal pain control. Multisensory stimulation with SSC may result in a higher behavioral state component of the PIPP score.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Blinding

