Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

503
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
503
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

430
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
430
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.2K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.2K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

924
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
924
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

332
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
332
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

377
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
377

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

A rational process model of reasoning causally with continuous variables.

Cognition·2025
Same author

A Magic Act in Causal Reasoning: Making Markov Violations Disappear.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Rational causal induction from events in time.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Inference from social evaluation.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Less is more: Local focus in continuous time causal learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same journal

Physical activity and academic burnout among middle school students: uncovering cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

CA-MuSiC: a Culture-Aware Multilingual Skill Cognition Model for MOOC review understanding.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

AI-driven psychological and cognitive decision processes in professional practice: a systematic review using music teachers as an instrumental case.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Personality traits explain levels of norm compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: patient-level participation barriers and ketogenic metabolic therapy as a candidate adjunct.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The effect of cooperative learning on nursing students' creative thinking disposition and self-regulated learning.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.9K

Causal Structure Learning in Continuous Systems.

Zachary J Davis1, Neil R Bramley2, Bob Rehder1

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

Frontiers in Psychology
|March 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adults can learn complex causal relationships in dynamic systems, but often focus on pairs of variables, leading to systematic errors. This research explores causal learning in continuous, time-varying environments.

Keywords:
causal learningcognitive modelingcomputational modelingdynamic systemsinterventionresource limitations

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.9K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Traditional causal learning research uses simplified, time-abstracted binary events.
  • Real-world causal systems are complex, continuous, and dynamic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate causal learning in continuous dynamic systems.
  • To develop a framework for representing and learning from such systems.
  • To understand human learning strategies and limitations in these environments.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework using Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) networks for continuous dynamic causal systems.
  • Conducted an experiment where participants identified causal relationships in OU networks through interventions.
  • Compared human judgments against normative and heuristic learning models.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated significant learning of complex dynamic causal systems.
  • Systematic errors were observed, suggesting specific learning biases.
  • A model focusing on pairwise variable interactions best explained human successes and failures.

Conclusions:

  • Humans can learn complex causal structures in continuous dynamic systems.
  • Learning is often biased towards simpler, pairwise relationships.
  • The OU network framework offers insights into human causal learning and dynamic environments.