Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Can resources save rationality? "Anti-Bayesian" updating in cognition and perception
Eric Mandelbaum1, Isabel Won2, Steven Gross3
1Baruch College, CUNY Graduate Center, Department of Philosophy, New York, NY10016emandelbaum@gc.cuny.eduhttp://ericmandelbaum.com.
Resource rationality may explain some reasoning errors. This study explores if it can also explain anti-Bayesian effects like belief polarization and the size-weight illusion.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Resource rationality theory posits that reasoning is optimized given cognitive constraints.
- However, some cognitive phenomena, termed 'anti-Bayesian' effects, involve updating beliefs in a direction opposite to evidence.
- Existing explanations for these effects are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether resource rationality can accommodate anti-Bayesian cognitive phenomena.
- To examine belief polarization and the size-weight illusion within the framework of resource rationality.
- To assess the explanatory power of resource rationality beyond performance limitations.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of resource rationality theory.
- Review and re-evaluation of existing literature on belief polarization and the size-weight illusion.
- Exploration of potential extensions or modifications to resource rationality to account for observed effects.
Main Results:
- Belief polarization and the size-weight illusion present challenges to standard resource rationality explanations.
- These phenomena may not be solely attributable to performance or resource constraints.
- The concept of 'reference repulsion' offers a partial but incomplete explanation.
Conclusions:
- Resource rationality may require refinement to fully encompass anti-Bayesian reasoning patterns.
- Further theoretical development is needed to explain phenomena where updating occurs contrary to evidence.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for a comprehensive model of human judgment and decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
Reason and Intuition
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
The Influence of Cognition on Affect

