Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

07:34
Layer Microdissection of Tricuspid Valve Leaflets for Biaxial Mechanical Characterization and Microstructural Quantification
Published on: February 10, 2022
2.3K
Biomechanics in DALK: Big bubble vs manual lamellar dissection
Mehmet Orcun Akdemir1, Banu Torun Acar2, Suphi Acar2
1Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia
|March 12, 2020
Summary
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) outcomes are similar whether big bubble formation succeeds or fails. Manual dissection in DALK does not negatively impact corneal biomechanical properties like hysteresis or resistance factor.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is a surgical technique for corneal diseases.
- Big bubble formation is a critical step in DALK, aiming to separate Descemet's membrane.
- Failed big bubble formation necessitates manual lamellar dissection, raising questions about its impact on corneal biomechanics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the biomechanical properties of corneal tissue after DALK surgery.
- To evaluate differences between successful big bubble formation and manual lamellar dissection.
- To assess the influence of donor-trephine punch size disparity on corneal biomechanics.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective comparative study of 60 keratoconus patients who underwent DALK.
- Patients were grouped based on successful (big bubble +) or failed (big bubble -) big bubble formation.
- Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer 12 months post-surgery.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in corneal hysteresis or corneal resistance factor between big bubble (+) and big bubble (-) groups.
- Corneal hysteresis and resistance factor were positively associated with central corneal thickness.
- No relationship was found between punch sizes and corneal hysteresis or resistance factor.
Conclusions:
- Corneal biomechanical properties (hysteresis and resistance factor) are comparable after DALK, regardless of big bubble formation success.
- Manual lamellar dissection is not disadvantageous concerning the biomechanical integrity of the cornea.
- Central corneal thickness is a significant factor influencing corneal biomechanical measurements post-DALK.

