Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

08:16
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
19.3K
Regionally-structured explanations behind area-level populism: An update to recent ecological analyses
Roger Beecham1, Nick Williams2, Alexis Comber1
1School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Plos One
|March 13, 2020
Summary
Regional voting patterns in the UK and US reveal complex factors beyond a simple "left-behind" narrative. Educational attainment is key, with other variables like material disadvantage influencing votes differently across regions and political contexts.
Area of Science:
- Political Geography
- Quantitative Social Science
- Electoral Studies
Background:
- Significant geographic disparities were observed in the 2016 Brexit and Trump votes.
- Existing ecological analyses have explored area-level voting variations.
- There is a need to explore subnational contexts often excluded from analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop modeling approaches for regionally-specific associations between voting outcomes and explanatory variables.
- To investigate the influence of educational attainment and material disadvantage on voting behavior.
- To compare and contrast the drivers of Brexit and Trump votes across different regions.
Main Methods:
- Generation of numerous regional models using penalized regression for variable selection and coefficient evaluation.
- Application of carefully designed visualizations to interpret over 100 model outputs within their spatial context.
- Analysis documented in an accompanying GitHub repository for transparency and replication.
Main Results:
- Educational attainment (degree-level) was the dominant explanatory variable across models.
- Material disadvantage influenced the Brexit vote more in historically industrial regions.
- The impact of material disadvantage on the Trump vote varied regionally, sometimes supporting and sometimes undermining the 'left-behind' hypothesis.
Conclusions:
- Voting behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of education, material disadvantage, and regional economic history.
- A nuanced, region-specific approach is crucial for understanding electoral patterns.
- The study highlights the importance of exploring subnational variations and employing robust, transparent methodologies in social science research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What are Populations and Communities?
36.9K
Overview
36.9K
Ecological Niches
25.9K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
25.9K
Conservation of Declining Populations
12.4K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
12.4K
Distribution and Dispersion
24.0K
To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
24.0K
Conservation of Small Populations
16.5K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
16.5K
Habitat Fragmentation
20.8K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.8K

