Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Outcome reporting in neonates experiencing withdrawal following opioid exposure in pregnancy: a systematic review
Flora Shan1, Sonya MacVicar2, Karel Allegaert3,4
1Department of Pediatric and Child Health, University of Manitoba, 405 Chown, 753 McDermot Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3E0T6, Canada.
Insights
Neonatal opioid withdrawal lacks standardized outcome reporting, hindering effective treatment guidelines. Developing a core outcome set is crucial for consistent research and improved care for affected families.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) research
- Evidence-based medicine
- Clinical trial methodology
Background:
- Neonatal withdrawal from in utero opioid exposure is a significant global health issue.
- Existing research lacks standardized outcome measurement, impeding evidence synthesis.
- Randomized controlled trials are vital for identifying effective treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and categorize outcomes reported in the literature for neonatal opioid withdrawal.
- To assess the consistency in outcome selection, definition, and reporting.
- To highlight the need for a standardized core outcome set.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search of major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central) from July 2007 to July 2017.
- Inclusion of various study designs, including RCTs, observational studies, and guidelines.
- Extraction and categorization of primary and secondary neonatal outcomes using OMERACT core areas.
Main Results:
- 107 primary and 127 secondary outcomes were identified across 47 articles.
- Most frequent outcomes: duration of pharmacotherapy, hospital stay, and withdrawal symptoms.
- Significant heterogeneity in outcome definitions and measurement, with no parent involvement.
Conclusions:
- Inconsistent outcome reporting in neonatal opioid withdrawal literature is a major limitation.
- Lack of standardized definitions and parent involvement hinders evidence synthesis.
- Development of a core outcome set is imperative for advancing clinical practice and guidelines.
Background:
Neonatal withdrawal secondary to in utero opioid exposure is a growing global concern stressing the psychosocial well-being of affected families and scarce hospital resources. In the ongoing search for the most effective treatment, randomized controlled trials are indispensable. Consistent outcome selection and measurement across randomized controlled trials enables synthesis of results, fostering the translation of research into practice. Currently, there is no core outcome set to standardize outcome selection, definition and reporting. This study identifies the outcomes currently reported in the literature for neonates experiencing withdrawal following opioid exposure during pregnancy.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify all primary research studies (randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, case-controlled studies, uncontrolled trials, observational cohort studies, clinical practice guidelines and case reports) reporting outcomes for interventions used to manage neonatal abstinence syndrome between July 2007 and July 2017. All "primary" and "secondary" neonatal outcomes were extracted by two independent reviewers and were assigned to one of OMERACT's core areas of "pathophysiological manifestation", "life impact", "resource use", "adverse events", or "death".
Results:
Forty-seven primary research articles reporting 107 "primary" and 127 "secondary" outcomes were included. The most frequently reported outcomes were "duration of pharmacotherapy" (68% of studies, N = 32), "duration of hospital stay" (66% of studies, N = 31) and "withdrawal symptoms" (51% of studies, N = 24). The discrepancy between the number of times an outcome was reported and the number of articles was secondary to the use of composite outcomes. Frequently reported outcomes had heterogeneous definitions or were not defined by the study and were measured at different times. Outcomes reported in the literature to date were mainly assigned to the core areas "pathophysiologic manifestations" or "resource use". No articles reported included parent or former patient involvement in outcome selections.
Conclusions:
Inconsistent selection and definition of primary and secondary outcomes exists in the present literature of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for managing opioid withdrawal in neonates. No studies involved parents in the process of outcome selection. These findings hinder evidence synthesis to generate clinically meaningful practice guidelines. The development of a specific core outcome set is imperative.
More Related Videos
05:13Preclinical Model of Prenatal Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure to Assess Its Impact on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Published on: February 28, 2025
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Analgesia and Pain Management
Opioid Analgesics: Morphine and Other Natural Cogeners
Opioid Receptors: Overview