Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Clinically Significant Pleural Effusion in Intensive Care: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Edward T H Fysh1,2,3, Portia Smallbone2, Nicholas Mattock1
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Objectives:
The prevalence and optimal management of clinically significant pleural effusion, confirmed by thoracic ultrasound, in the critically ill is unknown. This study aimed to determine: 1) the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated in intensive care with clinically significant effusion and 2) the comparative efficacy and safety of pleural drainage or expectant medical management.
Design:
A prospective multicenter cohort study.
Setting:
ICUs in four teaching hospitals in Western Australia.
Patients:
Consecutive patients with clinically significant pleural effusions (depth ≥ 2 cm on thoracic ultrasound with clinician-determined adverse effects on patient progress).
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
Primary outcome was the change in Pao2:Fio2 (mm Hg) ratio from baseline to 24 hours. Changes in diagnosis and treatment based on pleural fluid analysis and pleural effusion related serious adverse events between those who underwent either drainage within 24 hours or expectant management were compared. Of the 7,342 patients screened, 226 patients (3.1%) with 300 pleural effusions were enrolled. Early drainage of pleural effusion occurred in 76 patients (34%) and significantly improved oxygenation (Pao2:Fio2 ratio 203 at baseline vs 263 at 24 hr, +29.6% increment; p < 0.01). This was not observed in the other 150 patients who had expectant management (Pao2:Fio2 ratio 250 at baseline vs 268 at 24 hr, +7.2% increment; p = 0.44). The improvement in oxygenation after early drainage remained unchanged after adjustment for a propensity score on the decision to initiate early drainage. Pleural effusion related serious adverse events were not different between the two groups (early drainage 10.5% vs no early drainage 16.0%; p = 0.32). Improvements in diagnosis were noted in 91 initial (nonrepetitive) drainages (76.5% out of 119); treatment strategy was optimized after 80 drainage episodes (59.7% out of 134).
Conclusions:
Early drainage of clinically significant pleural effusion was associated with improved oxygenation and diagnostic accuracy without increased complications.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Pleural Effusion II: Symptoms and Management
A pleural effusion is the abnormal collection of fluid between the parietal and visceral pleura layers of tissue that form the lining of the lungs and chest cavity. It can occur independently or due to surrounding parenchymal diseases, such as infection, malignancy, or inflammatory conditions.
Clinical Manifestations:
01:25Pleural Effusion I: Introduction
There are two main types of pleural effusion: transudative and exudative. They are differentiated using Light's...
01:29Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
01:30Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
01:26Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History