Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Intervention for children with developmental coordination disorder: How robust is our recent evidence?
Motohide Miyahara1, Malgorzata Lagisz2, Shinichi Nakagawa2
1Department of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
Despite more reviews on interventions for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD), quality is a concern. Methodological flaws mean claims about intervention effects lack reliability.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Psychology
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Systematic and meta-analytical reviews are crucial for evaluating interventions for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
- The number of such reviews has significantly increased since 2015, prompting an assessment of their quality.
- This meta-review specifically examines eight new reviews published between 2015 and 2019.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of eight recent systematic and meta-analytical reviews on interventions for children with DCD.
- To assess the consistency of inclusion criteria, coverage of primary studies, and the quality of evidence used in these reviews.
- To determine if the increase in the quantity of reviews corresponds to an improvement in their methodological quality.
Main Methods:
- The study employed a meta-review approach to analyze eight selected review articles.
- Methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, Second Edition (AMSTAR 2) tool.
- Key evaluation criteria included consistency of inclusion criteria, coverage of primary studies, and the quality of evidence underpinning conclusions.
Main Results:
- Significant variability was observed among the eight reviews regarding inclusion criteria, primary evidence sources, and evidence quality.
- Only one review met an acceptably high standard of overall methodology according to AMSTAR 2 criteria; the others exhibited serious flaws.
- The conclusions drawn across the reviewed studies were inconsistent, likely due to methodological differences.
Conclusions:
- An increase in the number of reviews on interventions for children with DCD has not been matched by a sufficient improvement in quality.
- Persistent methodological issues in these reviews undermine confidence in reported intervention effects.
- Further research is needed to ensure the reliability and validity of evidence regarding interventions for DCD.
More Related Videos
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Conduct Disorder
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...