Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Three-dimensional Confocal Analysis of Microglia/macrophage Markers of Polarization in Experimental Brain Injury
Published on: September 4, 2013
Post-Ischaemic Immunological Response in the Brain: Targeting Microglia in Ischaemic Stroke Therapy
Charlotte Rawlinson1, Stuart Jenkins2, Laura Thei3
1School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
Abstract:
Microglia, the major endogenous immune cells of the central nervous system, mediate critical degenerative and regenerative responses in ischaemic stroke. Microglia become "activated", proliferating, and undergoing changes in morphology, gene and protein expression over days and weeks post-ischaemia, with deleterious and beneficial effects. Pro-inflammatory microglia (commonly referred to as M1) exacerbate secondary neuronal injury through the release of reactive oxygen species, cytokines and proteases. In contrast, microglia may facilitate neuronal recovery via tissue and vascular remodelling, through the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors (a profile often termed M2). This M1/M2 nomenclature does not fully account for the microglial heterogeneity in the ischaemic brain, with some simultaneous expression of both M1 and M2 markers at the single-cell level. Understanding and regulating microglial activation status, reducing detrimental and promoting repair behaviours, present the potential for therapeutic intervention, and open a longer window of opportunity than offered by acute neuroprotective strategies. Pharmacological modulation of microglial activation status to promote anti-inflammatory gene expression can increase neurogenesis and improve functional recovery post-stroke, based on promising preclinical data. Cell-based therapies, using preconditioned microglia, are of interest as a method of therapeutic modulation of the post-ischaemic inflammatory response. Currently, there are no clinically-approved pharmacological options targeting post-ischaemic inflammation. A major developmental challenge for clinical translation will be the selective suppression of the deleterious effects of microglial activity after stroke whilst retaining (or enhancing) the neurovascular repair and remodelling responses of microglia.
Insights
Microglia play dual roles in stroke recovery, with pro-inflammatory types causing damage and anti-inflammatory types aiding repair. Modulating microglial activation offers therapeutic potential for stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Microglia are key immune cells in the central nervous system, crucial for responses to ischaemic stroke.
- Microglial activation post-stroke involves proliferation and changes in morphology and gene expression, with both harmful and helpful effects.
- The M1/M2 classification of microglia is insufficient, as cells can express both pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) markers simultaneously.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the complex roles of microglia in ischaemic stroke.
- To investigate the potential of modulating microglial activation for therapeutic benefit.
- To address the challenges in translating microglial-targeted therapies into clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on microglial activation in ischaemic stroke.
- Analysis of the dual pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) roles of microglia.
- Discussion of preclinical data on pharmacological and cell-based modulation of microglial responses.
Main Results:
- Microglia exhibit heterogeneous responses post-stroke, with M1 phenotypes exacerbating injury and M2 phenotypes promoting recovery.
- Simultaneous expression of M1 and M2 markers occurs at the single-cell level, complicating the M1/M2 paradigm.
- Preclinical studies show that promoting anti-inflammatory microglial gene expression can enhance neurogenesis and functional recovery.
Conclusions:
- Targeting microglial activation offers a promising therapeutic strategy for ischaemic stroke, potentially extending the treatment window.
- Developing therapies requires selectively suppressing detrimental microglial effects while preserving beneficial repair functions.
- Currently, no drugs specifically target post-ischaemic inflammation, highlighting a significant gap in clinical treatment options.

