Diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to diagnose paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

High-throughput Flow Cytometry Cell-based Assay to Detect Antibodies to N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor or Dopamine-2 Receptor in Human Serum
Published on: November 23, 2013
Benoît Déchelotte1, Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo1, Bastien Joubert1
1From the French Reference Center on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes (B.D., S.M.-C., B.J., A.V., G.P., V.R., A.-L.P., V.D., J.H.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique; Synatac Team (B.D., S.M.-C., B.J., A.V., G.P., V.R., A.-L.P., V.D., J.H.), Institute NeuroMyoGène, INSERM U1217/CNRS UMR5310, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1; and Department of Immunology (B.D., C.L., N.F.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Objective:
To investigate the diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to detect onconeural antibodies associated with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs), we analyzed the proportion of confirmed positive results using alternative techniques.
Methods:
Sera (n = 5,300) of patients with suspected PNS were tested by PNS+2 blot (Ravo Diagnostika; January 2016-May 2017) or EUROLINE PNS 12 Ag (Euroimmun; July 2017-November 2018). Positive samples were further explored by in-house indirect immunofluorescence and a third in-house technique (Western blot or cell-based assay) using recombinant protein. Those found negative by these 2 techniques were considered as nonconfirmed. We analyzed the relationship between band intensity and final confirmation. Clinical data were collected for all confirmed results and nonconfirmed EUROLINE immunodots.
Results:
PNS+2 blot was positive in 128/1,658 (7.7%) sera and confirmed in 47/128 (36.7%). EUROLINE was positive in 186/3,626 (5.1%) and confirmed in 56/186 (30.1%). Confirmation was highly variable among the antibodies tested, from 7.2% (PNS+2 blot) and 5.8% (EUROLINE) for anti-Yo to 88.2% (PNS+2 blot) and 65.0% (EUROLINE) for anti-Hu. None of the 27 weak positive sera by EUROLINE was confirmed. Band intensity in confirmed cases was variable among the antibodies from strong positive for all anti-Yo (n = 3) and anti-Hu (n = 11) to positive (n = 19) or strong positive (n = 9) for anti-SOX1. Among patients with a nonconfirmed EUROLINE result and available clinical information, all had an alternative diagnosis, and only 6.7% had cancer.
Conclusions:
Immunodots may be useful for PNS screening, but a threshold should be established for each antibody, and clinical information and confirmation by other techniques are essential.
Classification Of Evidence:
The study provides Class IV evidence that immunodot assays for onconeural antibodies accurately identify patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

