Comparative analysis of prognostic histopathologic parameters in subtypes of epithelioid pleural mesothelioma

Agnes Bilecz1, Paul Stockhammer2,3, Dirk Theegarten4

  • 12nd Institute of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Histopathology
|March 15, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Histological subtypes of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) impact prognosis. Tubulopapillary/microcystic types show better survival and benefit more from multimodal therapy than solid/trabecular types.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis.
  • Epithelioid MPM has variable morphology, necessitating better prognostic factors.
  • Identifying patients for multimodal therapy requires refined prognostic stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the prognostic role of epithelioid MPM morphologies.
  • Assess the impact of nuclear grading and mitosis-necrosis scoring.
  • Determine if these factors can guide treatment selection.

Main Methods:

  • Histological subtyping of 192 epithelioid MPM cases from five European centers.
  • Correlation of subtypes, nuclear grade, and mitosis-necrosis score with survival.
  • External validation using 55 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Main Results:

  • Tubulopapillary/microcystic MPM had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than solid/trabecular (732 vs. 397 days).
  • Pleomorphic tumors showed the shortest OS (173 days).
  • Mitosis-necrosis score was an independent prognostic factor, validated in TCGA data.

Conclusions:

  • Epithelioid MPM histological subtypes significantly impact prognosis.
  • These subtypes can help select patients for intensive multimodal treatment.
  • Nuclear grade and mitosis-necrosis score are valuable prognostic indicators.