Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
CT and MRI findings in pancreatic trauma in children and correlation with outcome
Ala Ibrahim1,2, Paul W Wales3,4, Michael R Aquino1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Insights
Pediatric pancreatic trauma is rare but often involves other organs. Computed tomography (CT) grading of pancreatic injury correlates with management, guiding surgical or conservative treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Abdominal Imaging
- Trauma Imaging
Background:
- Limited published data exists on imaging for pancreatic trauma in children.
- Pediatric pancreatic injuries are infrequent but frequently associated with other organ damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pediatric pancreatic trauma.
- To correlate imaging-based injury grades with patient management and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 28 children with pancreatic injury from 2000-2016.
- Imaging (CT and MR) was reviewed and graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification.
- Clinical data, including management and outcomes, were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Pancreatic injury occurred in 0.86% of pediatric trauma activations, often with associated liver and lung injuries.
- AAST grading on CT correlated significantly with management (P=0.0001), with higher grades requiring intervention.
- MRI effectively visualized pancreatic duct injuries, showing parenchymal and ductal caliber changes.
Conclusions:
- CT grading of pediatric pancreatic trauma is crucial for guiding management decisions.
- MRI provides valuable insights into pancreatic ductal integrity, aiding in the assessment of complex injuries.
- Early and accurate imaging is essential for optimizing outcomes in pediatric pancreatic trauma.
Background:
There are limited published data on pancreatic trauma imaging in children.
Objective:
To present our experience using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of pancreatic trauma in children and to correlate the imaging grade of pancreatic injury with management and outcome.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective cohort study of children with pancreatic injury presenting between Jan. 1, 2000, and Dec. 31, 2016, was performed. Patient charts were reviewed to note demographics, the mechanism of injury, associated abdominal injuries, management and outcome. All imaging was rereviewed by two radiologists blinded to clinical and laboratory information, and pancreatic injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).
Results:
Of 3,265 patients presented as trauma team activations during the study period, only 28 (0.86%) children (19 boys, 9 girls; mean age: 7.14 years; age range: 1-15 years) had pancreatic injury. Of the available 27 CTs of the abdomen, 26 were performed on the day of trauma. Associated injuries were seen in 25/27 children, most frequently in the liver and lung, 16 (59.2%) each. There were 5 (19%) Grade I, 9 (33%) Grade II, 8 (30%) Grade III and 3 (11%) Grade IV. No patients had Grade V injury. No pancreatic parenchymal injury was identified in 2 (7%) patients with isolated fluid around the pancreas and mesentery. The pancreatic duct was visible in all 10 children (days: 0-330, median days: 41 post-trauma) who had MRI. Eight of these children, who had Grade III/IV injuries on CT and confirmed pancreatic duct injury on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or surgery, showed either signal intensity difference in pancreatic parenchyma and/or caliber difference in the pancreatic duct proximal and distal to the injury site. Two patients died because of multiorgan injuries, 9 patients (mainly with Grade III and IV injuries) underwent surgery and/or ERCP, and 16 patients were managed conservatively. AAST grading of pancreatic injury on CT correlated with type of management (P=0.0001) with most of the Grade III and IV injuries treated with intervention and/or surgery while all of the Grade I and II injuries were treated conservatively.
Conclusion:
Pancreatic injury is rare in children but often associated with other organ injuries most frequently involving the liver and lung. CT grading of injury correlates with management and guides intervention and/or surgery versus conservative treatment. MRI is useful for assessing pancreatic duct injury by demonstrating the pancreatic duct directly and/or secondary changes like signal intensity difference in pancreatic parenchyma and caliber difference in the pancreatic duct.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

