Inverse National Trends in Decompressive Craniectomy versus Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke

Nicolas K Khattar1, Beatrice Ugiliweneza1, Enzo M Fortuny1

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

World Neurosurgery
|March 17, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) use increased significantly for stroke treatment, while decompressive craniectomy (DC) use decreased. Findings suggest ET may reduce the need for DC in stroke patients.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Acute large vessel occlusion stroke requires timely intervention.
  • Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) is a key treatment for reducing infarct size.
  • Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is used for severe strokes, but its necessity may be influenced by ET.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze national trends in the utilization of ET versus DC for stroke treatment in the United States.
  • To investigate the relationship between ET and DC utilization over a 10-year period (2006-2016).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
  • Analysis of International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes for stroke patients from 2006 to 2016.
  • Comparison of utilization rates, patient demographics, outcomes, and hospital charges for ET and DC.

Main Results:

  • Stroke patient interventions with ET or DC increased by 266% from 2006 to 2016.
  • ET utilization rose from 0.19% to 14.07%, while DC utilization decreased from 7.07% to 6.43%.
  • ET was associated with shorter hospital stays, lower mortality, higher discharge home rates, and reduced costs compared to DC.

Conclusions:

  • A significant inverse relationship exists between ET and DC utilization for stroke treatment.
  • The increasing adoption of ET correlates with a declining use of DC.
  • Findings suggest that ET may reduce the need for DC in managing acute ischemic stroke.
Abstract