The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Insights
Extremely preterm infants deserve the same respect as other children. Shared decision-making, respecting parental discretion and the harm principle, ensures fair care for these vulnerable infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Medical Ethics
- Pediatric Care
Background:
- Neonatal care for preterm infants has advanced significantly.
- Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks gestation) present unique challenges in decision-making due to survival and neurodevelopmental concerns.
- Factors influencing decisions include medical uncertainty, parental impact, fetal-like appearance, and technology dependence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the ethical considerations in decision-making for extremely preterm infants.
- To evaluate the appropriateness of different ethical principles and decision-making models.
- To advocate for equitable care and decision-making processes.
Main Methods:
- Review of ethical principles relevant to pediatric decision-making, including best interest, reasonable person, "good enough" parent, and harm principle.
- Analysis of decision-making models such as Zone of Parental Discretion, Not Unreasonable Standard, and Shared Decision-Making.
- Discussion of the unique status and needs of extremely preterm infants.
Main Results:
- Extremely preterm infants should receive the same respect and care as other pediatric patients.
- Medical uncertainty and parental consequences necessitate a broad scope for parental decision-making.
- Shared decision-making, guided by the harm principle, offers a pragmatic and equitable approach.
Conclusions:
- Shared decision-making with significant parental discretion, based on the harm principle, is recommended for extremely preterm infants.
- Local guidelines are needed to support healthcare practitioners in rare cases where parents decline intensive care against medical advice.
- Ensuring consistency and fairness in care for extremely preterm infants is paramount.
Abstract:
Care of the preterm infant has improved tremendously over the last 60 years, with attendant improvement in outcomes. For the extremely preterm infant, <28 weeks' gestation, concerns related to survival as well as neurodevelopmental impairment, have influenced decision-making to a much larger extent than seen in older children. Possible reasons for conferring a different status on extremely preterm infants include: (1) the belief that the brain is a privileged organ, (2) the degree of medical uncertainty in terms of outcomes, (3) the fact that the family will deal with the psychological, emotional, physical, and financial consequences of treatment decisions, (4) that the extremely preterm looks more like a fetus than a term newborn, (5) the initial lack of relational identity, (6) the fact that extremely preterm infants are technology-dependent, and (7) the timing of decision-making around delivery. Treating extremely preterm infants differently does not hold up to scrutiny. They are owed the same respect as other pediatric patients, in terms of personhood, and we have the same duties to care for them. However, the degree of medical uncertainty and the fact that parents will deal with the consequences of decision-making, highlights the importance of providing a wide band of discretion in parental decision-making authority. Ethical principles considered in decision-making include best interest (historically the sine qua non of pediatric decision-making), a reasonable person standard, the "good enough" parent, and the harm principle, the latter two being more pragmatic. To operationalize these principles, potential models for decision-making are the Zone of Parental Discretion, the Not Unreasonable Standard, and a Shared Decision-Making model. In the final analysis shared decision-making with a wide zone of parental discretion, which is based on the harm principle, would provide fair and equitable decision-making for the extremely preterm infant. However, in the rare circumstance where parents do not wish to embark upon intensive care, against medical recommendations, it would be most helpful to develop local guidelines both for support of health care practitioners and to provide consistency of care for extremely preterm infants.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethics and Bioethics
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...

