Expression of CD163 and HLA-DR molecules on the monocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients

Wioleta Kowalska1

  • 1Chair and Department of Clinical Immunology Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. w.kowalska.lub@gmail.com.

Insights

Monocyte subsets in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients show distinct characteristics. CD16-positive monocytes are elevated, with classical monocytes expressing CD163 and non-classical monocytes showing low HLA-DR, potentially impacting immune responses.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Human peripheral blood monocytes play a role in the leukemia microenvironment.
  • Three monocyte subpopulations exist: classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and non-classical (CD14+CD16++).
  • These subpopulations differ in HLA-DR and CD163 expression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate HLA-DR and CD163 expression on monocyte subpopulations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
  • To compare monocyte subpopulations between CLL patients and healthy individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Flow cytometry was used to analyze peripheral blood monocyte subsets.
  • Monocytes from 40 CLL patients and 10 healthy controls were analyzed.
  • Specific monoclonal antibodies against CD14, CD16, CD163, and HLA-DR were employed.

Main Results:

  • CD16-positive monocytes were significantly higher in CLL patients compared to healthy donors.
  • Classical monocytes (CD14++CD16-) showed the highest percentage of CD163 expression.
  • Non-classical monocytes (CD14+CD16++) were the predominant cells with low HLA-DR expression.
  • No significant correlation was found between monocyte subpopulation percentages and CLL stage (Rai Staging).

Conclusions:

  • CD163 expression on classical monocytes suggests potential anti-inflammatory properties.
  • Low HLA-DR expression on non-classical monocytes may indicate impaired immune stimulation capacity in CLL.
  • Monocyte subset analysis provides insights into the immune microenvironment in CLL.
Abstract