Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Comparison of Cefepime-Cefpirome and Carbapenem Therapy for Acinetobacter Bloodstream Infection in a Multicenter
Yea-Yuan Chang1,2,3,4,5, Ya-Sung Yang6, Shang-Liang Wu7
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan.
Abstract:
Carbapenems are currently the preferred agents for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections. However, whether cefepime-cefpirome can be used to treat an Acinetobacter bloodstream infection (BSI) if it is active against the causative pathogen(s) is not clear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of cefepime-cefpirome and carbapenem monotherapy in patients with Acinetobacter BSI. The population included 360 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter BSI receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy admitted to four medical centers in Taiwan in 2012 to 2017. The predictors of 30-day mortality were determined by Cox regression analysis. The overall 30-day mortality rate in the appropriate antibiotic treatment group was 25.0% (90/360 patients). The crude 30-day mortality rates for cefepime-cefpirome and carbapenem therapy were 11.5% (7/61 patients) and 26.3% (21/80 patients), respectively. The patients receiving cefepime-cefpirome or carbapenem therapy were infected by Acinetobacter nosocomialis (51.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii (18.4%), and Acinetobacter pittii (12.1%). After adjusting for age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, invasive procedures, and underlying diseases, cefepime-cefpirome therapy was not independently associated with a higher or lower 30-day mortality rate compared to that with the carbapenem therapy. SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.324; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.137 to 1.543; P < 0.001) and neutropenia (HR, 7.060; 95% CI, 1.607 to 31.019; P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality of patients receiving cefepime-cefpirome or carbapenem monotherapy. The incidence densities of 30-day mortality for cefepime-cefpirome versus carbapenem therapy were 0.40% versus 1.04%, respectively. The therapeutic response of cefepime-cefpirome therapy was comparable to that with carbapenems among patients with Acinetobacter BSI receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
More Related Videos
07:16Development of a Polymicrobial Colony Biofilm Model to Test Antimicrobials in Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: September 20, 2024
09:26Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence