Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Antithrombotic Treatment After Coronary Intervention: Agreement and Controversy
Tamara García Camarero1, José M de la Torre Hernández1
1Department of Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Insights
This review examines antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy durations after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It highlights how treatment decisions for preventing stent thrombosis are guided by patient factors and procedural details.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease has advanced significantly with new devices, techniques, drugs, and strategies.
- Combination therapy with antiplatelet agents is crucial for preventing stent thrombosis post-PCI.
- The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or combined antiplatelet/anticoagulant regimens is a subject of ongoing research and clinical debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence and guidelines on antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy use following PCI.
- To focus on trials and recommendations concerning variable durations of combination antithrombotic regimens.
- To discuss alternative antithrombotic strategies and decision-making factors in clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent clinical trials and current international guidelines.
- Analysis of studies evaluating prolonged versus shortened durations of combination antithrombotic therapy.
- Synthesis of evidence considering patient profiles and procedural characteristics influencing treatment decisions.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests that modifying the duration of combination therapy (prolonging or shortening) impacts clinical outcomes differently across various patient populations and procedural complexities.
- Patient-specific risk factors (e.g., bleeding risk, thrombotic risk) and procedural factors (e.g., stent type, complexity) are key determinants for tailoring antithrombotic therapy.
- Ongoing research continues to refine recommendations for optimal treatment duration and alternative strategies.
Conclusions:
- Personalized antithrombotic strategies, balancing efficacy and safety, are essential after PCI.
- Clinical decisions regarding the duration of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy should be individualized based on comprehensive patient and procedural assessments.
- Further research is needed to optimize antithrombotic regimens for diverse patient groups undergoing PCI.
Abstract:
Percutaneous revascularisation has evolved dramatically in the past few decades. The approach to the management of ischaemic heart disease has changed due to the development of new devices and techniques as well as the availability of new drugs and treatment strategies. Its use in combination with antiplatelet therapies has been essential to protect against stent thrombosis. The length of time this combination therapy is used has been modified in recent years and has been the subject of extensive research. The effect of prolonging the time it is taken or shortening it has been evaluated in different clinical conditions. In practice, the decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention are informed by the patient's profile and the characteristics of the procedures performed. In this article, we review the use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention focusing on trials and guidelines addressing variable durations for combination regimens and the alternatives.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

