Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison Between ACC/AHA 2016 and ESC 2017 Guidelines
1King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, London, UK.
Insights
Balancing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease (CAD) involves managing risks of clotting and bleeding. This review compares ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines on DAPT, noting key differences for clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is crucial for managing coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Optimal DAPT strategies require balancing atherothrombotic event risk against bleeding complications.
- Numerous clinical trials have explored antiplatelet selection and treatment duration in stable CAD and acute coronary syndromes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare and contrast recent focused updates on prescribing DAPT in CAD from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
- To highlight key differences in DAPT recommendations between the two major guidelines.
- To provide commentary on the reasons behind these guideline discrepancies.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of current ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines on DAPT in CAD.
- Review of clinical trial evidence informing guideline recommendations.
- Expert commentary on the aetiology of differing recommendations.
Main Results:
- Both guidelines address DAPT in CAD, but present some divergent recommendations.
- Key differences exist in specific aspects of antiplatelet selection and treatment duration.
- The article elucidates the potential reasons for these variations in guidance.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the nuances between ACC/AHA and ESC DAPT guidelines is essential for optimal patient care in CAD.
- Clinicians should be aware of guideline differences to tailor therapy effectively.
- Further clarification on the evidence base may be needed to reconcile guideline disparities.
Abstract:
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is integral to the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) but there remains uncertainty as to the optimal approach for balancing an individual's risk of atherothrombotic events versus their risk of bleeding complications. A myriad of clinical trials have investigated how factors such as antiplatelet selection or duration of treatment can affect outcomes in both stable CAD and acute coronary syndromes. To aid clinicians in the challenge of applying trial findings to the circumstances of individual patients, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology have released focused updates on prescribing DAPT in CAD. While the two guidelines agree on many issues, there are some differences in the recommendations. This article highlights those differences and provides comment on their aetiology.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

