Bacterial contamination rate of platelet components by primary culture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sandra K White1, Robert L Schmidt1,2, Brandon S Walker2

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Transfusion
|March 18, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Bacterial contamination of platelets is a significant risk, with an overall rate of 1 in 1961. Apheresis (AP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) methods show lower contamination than buffy coat (BC) methods, and rates have decreased over time.

Area of Science:

  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Microbiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Platelets pose the highest bacterial contamination risk among blood components.
  • Septic transfusion reactions remain a clinical challenge.
  • Accurate contamination rates inform risk assessment and testing strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze bacterial contamination rates in platelets.
  • To estimate the overall contamination rate and identify sources of heterogeneity.
  • To compare contamination rates across different platelet collection methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search conducted in December 2019.
  • Meta-analysis of 22 studies involving over 5.7 million platelet components.
  • Meta-regression analysis to assess heterogeneity from collection method, sample volume, positivity criteria, and study date.

Main Results:

  • Overall bacterial contamination rate of 0.51 per 1000 components (1 in 1961).
  • Apheresis (AP) components: 0.23/1000; Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): 0.38/1000; Buffy coat (BC): 1.12/1000.
  • Significant heterogeneity observed; larger sample volumes increased sensitivity; contamination rates decreased over time.

Conclusions:

  • Platelet bacterial contamination rate by primary culture is 1 in 1961.
  • AP and PRP collection methods demonstrate lower contamination rates compared to BC.
  • Clinically significant variability exists; contamination rates are declining over time.