Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Techniques for Developing Reliable Machine Learning Classifiers Applied to Understanding and Predicting Protein:Protein Interaction Hot Spots.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2023
Same author

Epilogue to the Gerald Maggiora Festschrift: a tribute to an exemplary mentor, colleague, collaborator, and innovator.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2022
Same author

Ten quick tips for deep learning in biology.

PLoS computational biology·2022
Same author

Protein-ligand interfaces are polarized: discovery of a strong trend for intermolecular hydrogen bonds to favor donors on the protein side with implications for predicting and designing ligand complexes.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2018
Same author

Enabling the hypothesis-driven prioritization of ligand candidates in big databases: Screenlamp and its application to GPCR inhibitor discovery for invasive species control.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2018
Same author

Detecting the native ligand orientation by interfacial rigidity: SiteInterlock.

Proteins·2016
Same journal

Correction: Reis et al. Bioinks Enriched with ECM Components Obtained by Supercritical Extraction. <i>Biomolecules</i> 2022, <i>12</i>, 394.

Biomolecules·2026
Same journal

Correction: Kim, K.-H.; Yoo, B.C. Gintonin as a Lysophosphatidic Acid-Enriched GPCR Ligand System: Molecular Architecture and Receptor Pharmacology in <i>Panax ginseng</i>. <i>Biomolecules</i> 2026, <i>16</i>, 465.

Biomolecules·2026
Same journal

Correction: Bastyte et al. The Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Vitamin D, Total IgE, and Blood Eosinophils in Patients with Atopy. <i>Biomolecules</i> 2024, <i>14</i>, 212.

Biomolecules·2026
Same journal

AtHSPR Plays a Positive Role in Arabidopsis Resistance Against <i>Pseudomonas syringae</i> pv. <i>tomato</i> DC3000 by Interacting with TOP1.

Biomolecules·2026
Same journal

CYTH4 Facilitates Renal Cell Carcinoma via Enhancing Proliferation and Likely Immune Evasion.

Biomolecules·2026
Same journal

Integrated Immune-Gut Profiling Identifies an Exploratory Pediatric Inflammatory Intestinal Profile Associated with Food-Specific IgG Reactivity.

Biomolecules·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Monitoring GPCR-&#946;-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
08:21

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.2K

Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition.

Joseph Bemister-Buffington1, Alex J Wolf1, Sebastian Raschka1,2

  • 1Protein Structural Analysis and Design Lab, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1319, USA.

Biomolecules
|March 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning identifies protein flexibility changes that distinguish active from inactive G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This flexibility signature near the binding site predicts GPCR states and ligand activity.

Keywords:
GPCR activity determinantsMLxtendProFlexallosterycoupled residuesfeature selectionflexibility analysispattern classification

More Related Videos

Flexural Rigidity Measurements of Biopolymers Using Gliding Assays
07:55

Flexural Rigidity Measurements of Biopolymers Using Gliding Assays

Published on: November 9, 2012

11.1K
Capture Compound Mass Spectrometry - A Powerful Tool to Identify Novel c-di-GMP Effector Proteins
12:11

Capture Compound Mass Spectrometry - A Powerful Tool to Identify Novel c-di-GMP Effector Proteins

Published on: March 29, 2015

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Monitoring GPCR-&#946;-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
08:21

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.2K
Flexural Rigidity Measurements of Biopolymers Using Gliding Assays
07:55

Flexural Rigidity Measurements of Biopolymers Using Gliding Assays

Published on: November 9, 2012

11.1K
Capture Compound Mass Spectrometry - A Powerful Tool to Identify Novel c-di-GMP Effector Proteins
12:11

Capture Compound Mass Spectrometry - A Powerful Tool to Identify Novel c-di-GMP Effector Proteins

Published on: March 29, 2015

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate cellular responses to diverse stimuli.
  • Understanding GPCR conformational changes between active and inactive states is crucial for drug discovery.
  • Ligand binding is known to induce conformational shifts in GPCRs, but precise flexibility signatures remain elusive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a machine learning approach for identifying key structural features that differentiate active from inactive GPCR states.
  • To investigate the role of ligand-induced flexibility transitions in the activation mechanism of class A GPCRs.
  • To establish a predictive model for ligand behavior (activator vs. inhibitor) based on induced protein flexibility.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 3D structures of 18 inactive and 9 active class A GPCRs bound to ligands.
  • Application of graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis to identify flexible and rigid segments (helices and loops) after ligand removal.
  • Feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification to correlate flexibility patterns with GPCR activity states.

Main Results:

  • Four specific segments surrounding the ligand binding site were identified whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts GPCR activity (active vs. inactive).
  • Agonist-bound GPCRs exhibited more flexible and diverse conformational patterns compared to inhibitor-bound GPCRs, which showed rigid regions similar to inactive states.
  • A novel ligand-proximal flexibility signature predictive of GPCR activity was discovered, independent of ligand binding mode or known allosteric switch regions.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, combined with ProFlex analysis, can effectively identify flexibility signatures distinguishing GPCR active and inactive states.
  • The identified flexibility patterns provide a new method for predicting ligand efficacy (agonist or antagonist) based on induced protein dynamics.
  • This approach holds potential for broader application in predicting ligand behavior across various protein families.