Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

Robbers Cave

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...

Impact of Groups on Groups

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

Inclusive Fitness

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Choosy dispersal promotes the evolution of altruism.

Biology letters·2026

Same author

A formal theory of group-level adaptation for obligate eusociality.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2025

Same author

The consequences of constrained sex allocation in diploids and haplodiploids under local mate competition.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2025

Same author

Faster adaptation but slower divergence of X chromosomes under paternal genome elimination.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

The clonality window: relatedness and the group covariance effect in the evolution of division of labor.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025

Same author

Kin-discriminating partner choice promotes the evolution of helping.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025

Same journal

Cat colonies reshape the abundance and body size of lizards.

Biology letters·2026

Same journal

Visual signal dynamicity shapes detectability in the wild: an experiment with a mate-searching butterfly.

Biology letters·2026

Same journal

Transient marine species disproportionately expand the morphospace of North American continental freshwater fishes.

Biology letters·2026

Same journal

An unrecognized fine-scale host-plant adaptation in a leaf miner: correct dorsoventral egg orientation is essential for successful leaf entry.

Biology letters·2026

Same journal

Alpine adaptation drives rapid colour evolution in a Batesian mimic.

Biology letters·2026

Same journal

Song but not colour divergence constrains hybridization in birds.

Biology letters·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Does kin discrimination promote cooperation?

Gonçalo S Faria^1,2, Andy Gardner¹

¹School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Dyers Brae, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK.

Biology Letters

|March 19, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Kin discrimination, where individuals favor relatives, can alter cooperation levels. Mathematical analysis reveals it may increase, decrease, or maintain cooperation based on relatedness functions.

Keywords:

Jensen's inequality altruism inclusive fitness kin recognition kin selection veil of ignorance

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Behavioral ecology
Game theory

Background:

Genetic relatedness is fundamental to the evolution of cooperation.
Kin discrimination allows individuals to preferentially interact with relatives.
The precise impact of kin discrimination on average cooperation levels is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To mathematically analyze how kin discrimination influences the evolutionarily favored average level of cooperation.
To determine the conditions under which kin discrimination increases, decreases, or has no effect on cooperation.

Main Methods:

General mathematical analysis of cooperation dynamics in evolving populations.
Extension of the classic 'tragedy of the commons' model to incorporate kin discrimination.

Main Results:

Kin discrimination's effect on average cooperation depends on the shape of the cooperation-relatedness function (convex, concave, or linear).
It can lead to higher, lower, or unchanged population-level cooperation.

Conclusions:

Kin discrimination's impact on cooperation is context-dependent.
The findings offer a framework for future research into the evolutionary consequences of kin discrimination.