Are the tubular bones of the hand really the commonest site for an enchondroma?

To investigate whether the long-held view that the hand is the commonest site for an enchondroma is actually correct in light of more sensitive imaging techniques that are able to demonstrate small enchondromas at other skeletal sites.

A two-part retrospective study was undertaken. Part 1 comprised a review of the hand radiographs obtained in two major teaching hospitals over a 10-year period to establish the incidence of enchondroma in the hand. Part 2 was a review of a series of enchondromas of the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia <4 cm in length on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to see which cases were visible or not on corresponding radiographs.

Part 1: 84 enchondromas were identified on 116,354 trauma radiographs to give an incidence of 0.07%. Part 2: 157 patients with an enchondroma on MRI <4 cm were reviewed. Only 17% of lesions <2 cm in length were visible on the contemporaneous radiographs. In lesions that were 2-2.9 and 3-3.9 cm the percentage visible on the radiographs increased to 58 and 77%, respectively.

It is well recognised from existing studies that incidental enchondromas can be seen in approximately 2.5% of routine shoulder and knee MRI scans. This figure is 35 times higher than the incidence found in the series of hand trauma radiographs. This infers that the hand should no longer be considered as the commonest site for an enchondroma. This is because radiographs are relatively insensitive to the detection of small lesions in larger bones, such as the proximal humerus and around the knee, when compared with MRI.