Accuracy of subjective vesicoureteral reflux timing assessment: supporting new voiding cystourethrogram guidelines
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
Published on: June 7, 2024
Dabin Ji1, Derrick E Ridley2, J Damien Grattan-Smith3
1Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA.
Insights
Pediatric specialists cannot accurately determine vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) timing from voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images alone. Recording bladder volume during VUR is crucial for assessing resolution risk and preventing infections.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Radiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Bladder volume at the onset of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a key prognostic indicator.
- It helps predict spontaneous resolution and the risk of pyelonephritis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ability of pediatric urologists and radiologists to estimate VUR timing from voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images.
- To determine if this estimation is accurate without knowing the instilled contrast volume.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-nine patients' VCUG images were analyzed.
- Pediatric specialists estimated VUR timing (early/mid-filling, late-filling, voiding only) in a blinded manner.
- Weighted kappa statistic assessed agreement with gold standard volume-based reports.
Main Results:
- Overall agreement among raters was moderate (k=0.43).
- Individual rater agreement with the gold standard was slight to moderate (kappa values 0.13-0.43).
- Mean patient age was 3.1 months, median VUR grade was 3.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric specialists cannot reliably determine VUR timing from fluoroscopic VCUG images alone.
- Routine recording of bladder volume at VUR onset is recommended.
- This aids in assessing resolution likelihood and recurrent urinary tract infection risk.
Background:
Bladder volume at the onset of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an important prognostic indicator of spontaneous resolution and the risk of pyelonephritis.
Objective:
We aim to determine whether pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists can accurately estimate the timing of reflux by examining voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images without prior knowledge of the instilled contrast volume.
Materials And Methods:
Total bladder volume and the volume at the time of reflux were collected from VCUG reports to determine the volume at the onset of VUR. Thirty-nine patients were sorted into three groups: early-/mid-filling reflux, late-filling and voiding only. Thirty-nine images were shown to three pediatric urologists and two pediatric radiologists in a blinded fashion and they were then asked to estimate VUR timing based on the above categories. A weighted kappa statistic was calculated to assess rater agreement with the gold standard volume-based report of VUR timing.
Results:
The mean patient age at VCUG was 3.1±2.9 months, the median VUR was grade 3, and 20 patients were female. Overall agreement among all five raters was moderate (k=0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.50). Individual agreement between rater and gold standard was slight to moderate with kappa values ranging from 0.13 to 0.43.
Conclusion:
Pediatric radiologists and urologists are unable to accurately and reliably characterize VUR timing on fluoroscopic VCUG. These findings support the recently published American Academy of Pediatrics protocol recommending the routine recording of bladder volume at the onset of VUR as a standard component of all VCUGs to assist in a more accurate assessment of the likelihood of resolution and risk of recurrent urinary tract infections.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

