Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

992
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
992
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

99
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
99
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting01:14

Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting

123
Altercasting is a strategic communication technique in which an individual imposes a specific identity or social role onto another person to influence their behavior and shape the interaction. By presuming a role—such as “responsible leader” or “patient person”—altercasting encourages the target to conform to that identity, often aligning their behavior with the expectations associated with the role. The power of this tactic lies in its subtlety; once a role...
123
Torts III01:26

Torts III

923
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
923
Torts II01:13

Torts II

829
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
829
Sources of Law01:26

Sources of Law

1.7K
Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Congress Extends Enhanced ACA Subsidies.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022
Same author

Supreme Court Ends Right To Abortion.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022
Same author

Subsidy Cliff Looms; Fixing The Family Glitch.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022
Same author

Record ACA Enrollment; 2023 Payment Rule.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022
Same author

House Advances Build Back Better Act.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2021
Same author

ACA Changes Considered; Coverage Held Steady.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.2K

ACA Litigation: Politics Pursued through Other Means.

Timothy Stoltzfus Jost1, Katie Keith2

  • 1Washington and Lee University.

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
|March 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) faces ongoing political division, leading to extensive litigation. Courts have become a key arena for policy battles over the ACA, impacting future health reform efforts.

Keywords:
Affordable Care Actexecutive authorityhealth reformlitigation

More Related Videos

Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
10:05

Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation

Published on: July 4, 2014

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.2K
Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
10:05

Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation

Published on: July 4, 2014

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Political Science
  • Judicial Studies

Background:

  • The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted a decade ago, continues to be a politically contentious piece of legislation.
  • Political divisions surrounding the ACA are evident across federal and state government branches.
  • A legislative stalemate has prompted executive actions and increased reliance on judicial challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history of litigation concerning the Affordable Care Act.
  • To analyze legal norms and strategies employed in ACA-related court cases.
  • To consider the implications of ACA litigation for future health reform initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of ACA litigation.
  • Analysis of legal strategies, including broadside attacks and targeted challenges.
  • Examination of judicial norms such as forum shopping and nationwide injunctions.

Main Results:

  • Litigation has become a primary method for advancing policy agendas related to the ACA.
  • State attorneys general and governors have actively participated in ACA legal battles, forming partisan coalitions.
  • ACA litigation has raised questions about the adversarial nature of the courts and the impact of judicial decisions.

Conclusions:

  • The judiciary has become a central battleground for ACA policy disputes.
  • The history of ACA litigation and evolving judicial landscape present challenges for future health reform.
  • Understanding these legal dynamics is crucial for navigating subsequent health policy efforts.