Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sexual decision making and object relations theory.

B J Randolph1, B Winstead

  • 1Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern Division, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Archives of Sexual Behavior
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The convergence of regenerative medicine and rehabilitation: federal perspectives.

NPJ Regenerative medicine·2018
Same author

Analysis of munitions constituents in IMX formulations by HPLC and HPLC-MS.

Talanta·2014
Same author

Comparison of nonballistic active knee extension in neural slump position and static stretch techniques on hamstring flexibility.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·1997
Same author

Retrospective evaluation of graded stress examination of the ankle.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·1996
Same author

ANA Code for Nurses with Interpretive Statements--explications for perioperative nursing.

AORN journal·1993
Same journal

The Hurlbert Index of Sexual Desire-Short Form: Psychometric Properties.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Attitudes of Victim-Blame Toward Image-Based Sexual Abuse Victim-Survivors in Fiji: Understanding Gendered and Cultural Norms.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Sociopolitical Drivers of Health Disparities in LGBTQ+ Communities within the United States: Historical Context and Contemporary Policy.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Active, Passive, and Non-Sexting Adolescents: Testing Deviancy and Normalcy Perspectives Across Risk-Related and Sexual Competence Variables.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Perceived Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Attractiveness, Age, and Parity Judgments in Pre-Contemporary European Portraits of Clothed Women.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same journal

Nulliparous Women's Self-Objectification, Fear of Childbirth, and Fertility Intentions: A Mediational Model.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
See all related articles

The Sexual Decision-Making Inventory (SDMI) measures sexual decision-making levels. Findings link higher object constancy to better relationships, while other factors correlate with poorer relationship quality.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Object Relations Theory provides a framework for understanding interpersonal relationships.
  • Sexual decision-making is a complex process influenced by psychological factors.
  • Existing measures may not fully capture the nuances of sexual decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate the Sexual Decision-Making Inventory (SDMI).
  • To explore the relationship between sexual decision-making levels and perceptions of romantic relationships.
  • To identify sex differences in sexual decision-making patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Development and pilot testing of the SDMI with undergraduate students.
  • Factor analysis to define distinct levels of sexual decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlational studies using the SDMI, object relations measures, and relationship perception questionnaires.
  • Main Results:

    • Six levels of sexual decision-making were identified: Object Constancy, Ambivalence, Need for Merger, Need Gratification, Low Self-esteem, and Narcissistic Gratification.
    • Object Constancy positively correlated with relationship satisfaction and durability.
    • Ambivalence, Need Gratification, and Low Self-esteem negatively correlated with relationship quality; Narcissistic Gratification showed mixed correlations.
    • Females endorsed Object Constancy more, while males endorsed Ambivalence, Need Gratification, and Narcissistic Gratification more.

    Conclusions:

    • The SDMI effectively measures distinct levels of sexual decision-making.
    • Object Relations Theory concepts are relevant to understanding sexual decision-making and relationship quality.
    • Identified sex differences suggest varying psychological motivations in sexual decision-making between males and females.