Discussion of Trial Designs for Biomarker Identification and Validation Through the Use of Case Studies

Fang-Shu Ou1, Ming-Wen An2, Amy S Ruppert3

  • 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

JCO Precision Oncology
|March 20, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Precision medicine tailors treatments to individuals, moving beyond single-biomarker trials. This article explores five key trial designs—enrichment, umbrella, basket, subgroup, and window of opportunity—crucial for advancing personalized cancer care.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • The National Cancer Institute's Precision Medicine Initiative (2015) spurred a shift towards personalized healthcare.
  • Traditional trial designs (one-trial/one-biomarker-at-a-time) are being replaced by more adaptive approaches.
  • Identifying and validating biomarkers is essential for effective targeted therapy selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss five distinct precision medicine trial designs.
  • To detail the characteristics, case studies, recent advances, and pros/cons of each design.
  • To provide a comprehensive overview of innovative clinical trial strategies for personalized medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of five trial designs: enrichment, umbrella, basket, subgroup, and window of opportunity.
  • Analysis of design characteristics and application through case studies.
  • Exploration of recent advancements and comparative advantages/disadvantages.

Main Results:

  • Detailed descriptions of enrichment, umbrella, basket, subgroup, and window of opportunity trial designs.
  • Illustrative examples from ongoing or completed clinical trials for each design.
  • Discussion of the strengths and limitations inherent in each approach.

Conclusions:

  • These five trial designs are pivotal for realizing the potential of precision medicine.
  • Understanding these designs is critical for optimizing patient selection and therapeutic efficacy.
  • The article serves as a guide to navigating the evolving landscape of cancer clinical trials.

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
116
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
796
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
336
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
155
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
91
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
143