Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Coronary Access After TAVR
Tomoki Ochiai1, Tarun Chakravarty2, Sung-Han Yoon2
1Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/TomokiOchiai.
Insights
Unfavorable coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is common, especially with certain valve types. Features identified by computed tomography (CT) predict challenges in future coronary engagement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is crucial for managing potential complications.
- Limited real-world data exists on the incidence and predictors of unfavorable coronary access post-TAVR.
- Post-implantation computed tomography (CT) is a valuable tool for assessing anatomical relationships after TAVR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency of unfavorable coronary access following TAVR using post-implantation CT.
- To compare the incidence of unfavorable coronary access between different TAVR valve designs (Evolut R/PRO vs. SAPIEN 3).
- To determine the impact of CT-identified unfavorable coronary access on subsequent coronary engagement success.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of post-TAVR CT scans from patients who received Evolut R/PRO (n=66) or SAPIEN 3 (n=345) valves.
- Assessment of the distance between the transcatheter heart valve (THV) inflow and coronary ostia, and overlap with THV commissures.
- Definition of unfavorable coronary access based on the position of the coronary ostium relative to the THV skirt and commissural posts.
Main Results:
- Unfavorable coronary access features were observed in 34.8% (left) and 25.8% (right) of the Evolut R/PRO group, versus 15.7% (left) and 8.1% (right) in the SAPIEN 3 group.
- Selective coronary engagement success rates were significantly lower in patients with unfavorable coronary access (0.0% for Evolut R/PRO, 33.3% for SAPIEN 3) compared to favorable access (77.8% for Evolut R/PRO, 91.4% for SAPIEN 3).
- These differences were statistically significant (p=0.003) for both valve types.
Conclusions:
- Coronary access can be challenging in a substantial number of patients post-TAVR.
- THV designs with lower skirts, commissure heights, and larger open cells may improve future coronary access.
- CT assessment of post-TAVR anatomy is essential for predicting and potentially mitigating coronary access difficulties.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of unfavorable coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using post-implantation computed tomography (CT).
Background:
Real-world data regarding coronary access after TAVR assessed using post-implantation CT are scarce.
Methods:
Post-TAVR CT of 66 patients treated with Evolut R or Evolut PRO valves and 345 patients treated with SAPIEN 3 valves were analyzed. The distance from inflow of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) to the coronary ostia and the overlap between THV commissures and the coronary ostia were assessed. Coronary access was defined as unfavorable if the coronary ostium was below the skirt or in front of the THV commissural posts above the skirt in each coronary artery.
Results:
CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access were observed in 34.8% (n = 23) for the left coronary artery and 25.8% (n = 17) for the right coronary artery in the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, while those percentages were 15.7% (n = 54) for the left coronary artery and 8.1% (n = 28) for the right coronary artery in the SAPIEN 3 group. In the Evolut R/Evolut PRO group, 16 coronary engagements were performed after TAVR, while 64 coronary engagements were performed in the SAPIEN 3 group after TAVR. In an engagement-level analysis, the success rates of selective coronary engagement were significantly lower in patients with CT-identified features of unfavorable coronary access compared with those with favorable coronary access in both the Evolut R/Evolut PRO (0.0% vs. 77.8%; p = 0.003) and SAPIEN 3 (33.3% vs. 91.4%; p = 0.003) groups.
Conclusions:
Coronary access may be challenging in a significant proportion of patients after TAVR. THVs with low skirt or commissure height and large open cells that are designed to achieve commissure-to-commissure alignment with the native aortic valve may facilitate future coronary access. (Assessment of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis and Its Treatment With Anticoagulation [RESOLVE]; NCT02318342).
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization