Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation With Survival Among US Veterans
Nirupama Krishnamurthi1,2, David W Schopfer1,3, Hui Shen1,3
1San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Insights
Veterans participating in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) at Veterans Affairs (VA) or non-VA facilities showed similar 1-year mortality and readmission rates. These findings support participation in CR programs irrespective of the provider for patients with ischemic heart disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation is low among Veterans Affairs (VA) patients, with most receiving care through non-VA programs.
- Limited comparative data exists on outcomes between VA and non-VA CR programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 1-year mortality and readmission rates for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization between VA and non-VA CR participants.
- To inform CR program utilization and patient care strategies within the VA system.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 7320 veterans hospitalized for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization between 2010-2014.
- Comparison of 1-year all-cause mortality and readmission rates using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability treatment weighting.
- Exclusion of patients who died within 30 days of discharge or did not participate in at least two CR sessions.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 1-year mortality rates between VA (1.7%) and non-VA (1.3%) CR participants (HR, 1.32; P=.15).
- No significant difference in 1-year readmission rates for myocardial infarction or revascularization between VA (4.9%) and non-VA (4.4%) CR participants (HR, 1.06; P=.62).
- Minority veterans were more likely to attend VA CR programs, while white veterans favored non-VA programs.
Conclusions:
- Outcomes regarding 1-year mortality and readmission are comparable between VA and non-VA CR programs.
- Veterans with ischemic heart disease are encouraged to participate in CR programs, regardless of the facility.
- Findings support the effectiveness of CR services across different healthcare settings for veterans.
Importance:
Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs at Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities is low. Most veterans receive CR through purchased care at non-VA programs. However, limited literature exists on the comparison of outcomes between VA and non-VA CR programs.
Objective:
To compare 1-year mortality and 1-year readmission rates for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization between VA vs non-VA CR participants.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cohort study included 7320 patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization at the VA between 2010 and 2014 who did not die within 30 days of discharge and who participated in 2 or more CR sessions after discharge. The study excluded individuals hospitalized for ischemic heart disease after December 2014 when the VA Choice Act changed referral criteria for non-VA care. Data analysis was performed from November 2019 to January 2020.
Exposures:
Participation in 2 or more CR sessions within 12 months of discharge at a VA or non-VA facility.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The 1-year all-cause mortality and 1-year readmission rates for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization from date of discharge were compared between VA vs non-VA CR participants using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability treatment weighting.
Results:
The 7320 veterans with ischemic heart disease who participated in CR programs had a mean (SD) age of 65.13 (8.17) years and were predominantly white (6005 patients [82.0%]), non-Hispanic (6642 patients [91.0%]), and male (7191 patients [98.2%]). Among these 7320 veterans, 2921 (39.9%) attended a VA facility, and 4399 (60.1%) attended a non-VA CR facility. Black and Hispanic veterans were more likely to attend CR programs at VA facilities (509 patients [17.4%] and 378 patients [12.9%], respectively), whereas white veterans were more likely to attend CR programs at non-VA facilities (3759 patients [85.5%]). After inverse probability treatment weighting, rates of 1-year mortality were 1.7% among VA CR participants vs 1.3% among non-VA CR participants (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.90-1.94; P = .15). Rates of readmission for myocardial infarction or revascularization during the 12 months after discharge were 4.9% among VA CR participants vs 4.4% among non-VA CR participants (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.35; P = .62).
Conclusions And Relevance:
These findings suggest that rates of 1-year mortality and 1-year readmission for myocardial infarction or revascularization did not differ for participants in VA vs non-VA cardiac rehabilitation programs. Eligible patients with ischemic heart disease should participate in CR programs regardless of where they are provided.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

