Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
698
Patient Uptake, Experience, and Satisfaction Using Web-Based and Face-to-Face Hearing Health Services: Process
Husmita Ratanjee-Vanmali1, De Wet Swanepoel1,2,3, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque4,5
1Department of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
|March 21, 2020
Summary
A hybrid hearing health service combining online and in-person care shows high patient satisfaction. This model improves access and scalability for adults with hearing loss globally.
Area of Science:
- Audiology and Hearing Health
- Digital Health and Telemedicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Access to hearing healthcare is a global concern, with limited services for the growing number of individuals with hearing loss.
- Current audiology research often overlooks patient experience and sustainable models in favor of technical feasibility.
- Web-based services offer a potential solution to improve access and scalability in hearing healthcare delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the uptake, patient experience, and satisfaction of a hybrid (Web-based and face-to-face) hearing health service.
- To evaluate a novel service model for adult patients experiencing hearing loss.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of a hybrid hearing clinic in Durban, South Africa, with online recruitment via social media and online advertising.
- Utilized a Web-based hearing screening test, followed by online and face-to-face assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation pathways.
- Conducted an online survey including a validated satisfaction tool, process evaluation, and communication preferences assessment.
Main Results:
- High patient satisfaction (Net Promoter Score of 87) and willingness to recommend the service.
- The online screening test aided 92% of patients in seeking care, with most preferring WhatsApp for communication.
- Patients continuing care were older and had poorer speech recognition; age positively correlated with appointment frequency.
Conclusions:
- A hybrid hearing clinic model integrating Web-based and face-to-face components demonstrates high patient satisfaction and positive experiences.
- This hybrid model, utilizing synchronous and asynchronous communication, shows potential as a scalable solution for global hearing healthcare needs.
- Findings support the integration of digital health tools into audiology practice to enhance patient access and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K
Nursing Evaluation
4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Blind Procedures
12.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.7K

