Unchanged cerebrovascular CO₂ reactivity and hypercapnic ventilatory response during strict head-down tilt bed rest...

Carbon dioxide levels are mildly elevated on the International Space Station and it is unknown whether this chronic exposure causes physiological changes to astronauts. We combined ∼4 mmHg ambient $$ with the strict head-down tilt bed rest model of spaceflight and this led to the development of optic disc oedema in one-half of the subjects. We demonstrate no change in arterialized $$ , cerebrovascular reactivity to CO₂ or the hypercapnic ventilatory response. Our data suggest that the mild hypercapnic environment does not contribute to the development of spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome.

Chronically elevated carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) levels can occur in confined spaces such as the International Space Station. Using the spaceflight analogue 30 days of strict 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) in a mild hypercapnic environment ( $$ = ∼4 mmHg), we investigated arterialized $$ , cerebrovascular reactivity and the hypercapnic ventilatory response in 11 healthy subjects (five females) before, on days 1, 9, 15 and 30 of bed rest (BR), and 6 and 13 days after HDTBR. During all HDTBR time points, arterialized $$ was not significantly different from the pre-HDTBR measured in the 6° HDT posture, with a mean (95% confidence interval) increase of 1.2 mmHg (-0.2 to 2.5 mmHg, P = 0.122) on day 30 of HDTBR. Respiratory acidosis was never detected, although a mild metabolic alkalosis developed on day 30 of HDTBR by a mean (95% confidence interval) pH change of 0.032 (0.022-0.043; P < 0.001), which remained elevated by 0.021 (0.011-0.031; P < 0.001) 6 days after HDTBR. Arterialized pH returned to pre-HDTBR levels 13 days after BR with a change of -0.001 (-0.009 to 0.007; P = 0.991). Compared to pre-HDTBR, cerebrovascular reactivity during and after HDTBR did not change. Baseline ventilation, ventilatory recruitment threshold and the slope of the ventilatory response were similar between pre-HDTBR and all other time points. Taken together, these data suggest that the mildly increased ambient $$ combined with 30 days of strict 6° HDTBR did not change arterialized $$ levels. Therefore, the experimental conditions were not sufficient to elicit a detectable physiological response.