Mismatch-negativity (MMN) in animal models: Homology of human MMN?

Tomoyo Isoguchi Shiramatsu1, Hirokazu Takahashi1

  • 1Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.

Hearing Research
|March 22, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Mismatch negativity (MMN) research in animals shows MMN-like responses differ from human MMN. These responses may reflect empirical salience, not just deviance detection.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a neural marker for deviance detection in humans.
  • MMN-like responses in animal models are debated for homology with human MMN.
  • Distinguishing MMN-like responses from adaptation effects is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare electrophysiological, pharmacological, and functional properties of MMN-like responses and middle-latency responses (MLRs) in animals and humans.
  • To clarify the nature and function of MMN-like responses in animal models.
  • To propose a new functional role for MMN-like responses beyond simple deviance detection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of studies comparing MMN-like responses and adaptation-exhibiting MLRs in animals and humans.
  • Analysis of electrophysiological, pharmacological, and functional data.
  • Introduction of recent research demonstrating empirical salience of deviant stimuli in MMN-like responses.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests clear differences between MMN-like responses and MLRs.
  • MMN-like responses can be distinguished from stimulus-specific adaptation.
  • MMN-like responses may represent empirical salience of deviant stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • MMN-like responses in animals are not strictly homologous to human MMN.
  • MMN-like responses have a functional role beyond basic deviance detection.
  • Future research should explore MMN-like responses as indicators of empirical salience.