Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Battery of Highly Reproducible Behavioral Tests to Validate an Angelman Syndrome Murine Model
Published on: October 20, 2023
Mismatch-negativity (MMN) in animal models: Homology of human MMN?
Tomoyo Isoguchi Shiramatsu1, Hirokazu Takahashi1
1Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Abstract:
Mismatch negativity (MMN) has long been considered to be one of the deviance-detecting neural characteristics. Animal models exhibit similar neural activities, called MMN-like responses; however, there has been considerable debate on whether MMN-like responses are homologous to MMN in humans. Herein, we reviewed several studies that compared the electrophysiological, pharmacological, and functional properties of MMN-like responses and adaptation-exhibiting middle-latency responses (MLRs) in animals with those in humans. Accumulating evidence suggests that there are clear differences between MMN-like responses and MLRs, in particular that MMN-like responses can be distinguished from mere effects of adaptation, i.e., stimulus-specific adaptation. Finally, we discuss a new direction for research on MMN-like responses by introducing our recent work, which demonstrated that MMN-like responses represent empirical salience of deviant stimuli, suggesting a new functional role of MMN beyond simple deviance detection.
Insights
Mismatch negativity (MMN) research in animals shows MMN-like responses differ from human MMN. These responses may reflect empirical salience, not just deviance detection.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Auditory Perception
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a neural marker for deviance detection in humans.
- MMN-like responses in animal models are debated for homology with human MMN.
- Distinguishing MMN-like responses from adaptation effects is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare electrophysiological, pharmacological, and functional properties of MMN-like responses and middle-latency responses (MLRs) in animals and humans.
- To clarify the nature and function of MMN-like responses in animal models.
- To propose a new functional role for MMN-like responses beyond simple deviance detection.
Main Methods:
- Review of studies comparing MMN-like responses and adaptation-exhibiting MLRs in animals and humans.
- Analysis of electrophysiological, pharmacological, and functional data.
- Introduction of recent research demonstrating empirical salience of deviant stimuli in MMN-like responses.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests clear differences between MMN-like responses and MLRs.
- MMN-like responses can be distinguished from stimulus-specific adaptation.
- MMN-like responses may represent empirical salience of deviant stimuli.
Conclusions:
- MMN-like responses in animals are not strictly homologous to human MMN.
- MMN-like responses have a functional role beyond basic deviance detection.
- Future research should explore MMN-like responses as indicators of empirical salience.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

