Endoscopic-assisted surgery versus microsurgery for pineal region tumors: a single-center retrospective study

Pineal region tumors are extremely deep-seated and surgically challenging. The exposure and visualization obtained by microscopic surgery are relatively limiting. The application of high-definition endoscopes has recently provided neurosurgeons with a much more magnified and clearer view of the anatomy in the pineal region. The present study was performed to compare endoscopic-assisted surgery (ES) with microsurgery (MS) for pineal region tumors. We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to our hospital for treatment of pineal region tumors from January 2016 to June 2019. All patients consented to undergo tumor resection with ES or MS. We compared the extent of resection, postoperative rate of hydrocephalus, complications, and outcomes between the two groups to estimate the safety and efficacy of ES. In total, 41 patients with pineal region tumors were divided into 2 groups: the ES group (n = 20) and MS group (n = 21). The rate of gross total resection was significantly higher in the ES than MS group (90.0% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.04). The rate of postoperative hydrocephalus was significantly lower in the ES than MS group (11.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in complications or the Karnofsky Performance Score between the two groups. ES can be used to safely and effectively achieve complete resection of pineal region tumors. In patients with obstructive hydrocephalus, ES provides a new way to directly open the aqueduct for cerebrospinal fluid recovery following tumor resection.