Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

07:48
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
10.3K
Return of Individual Research Results: A Guide for Biomedical Researchers Utilizing Human Biospecimens
Mark E Sobel1, Jennifer C Dreyfus2, Kelsey Dillehay McKillip3
1American Society for Investigative Pathology, Rockville, Maryland.
The American Journal of Pathology
|March 24, 2020
Summary
Returning individual research results from human biospecimen studies presents ethical and legal challenges. This article explores the rationale, risks, and US legal framework, offering recommendations for balancing subject interests and research integrity.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Laboratory Medicine
- Genomic Research
Background:
- Returning individual research results (IRR) from human biospecimen research poses ethical and legal complexities.
- Participant interest in knowing test results conflicts with potential risks and existing medical laboratory regulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the rationale and potential risks of returning IRR to study participants.
- To examine the US legal framework governing the testing of identifiable human biospecimens.
- To provide recommendations for investigators conducting human biospecimen research.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and legal analysis of existing US laws and regulations.
- Discussion of ethical considerations regarding participant autonomy and potential harms.
- Synthesis of findings to develop practical recommendations for researchers.
Main Results:
- The drive to return IRR is increasing, creating tension with established practices.
- Potential risks include psychological distress, misuse of information, and challenges to the research process.
- The current US legal landscape for laboratory testing is complex and may not fully address IRR from research.
Conclusions:
- A careful balance is needed between participants' right to know and the protection of individuals and research integrity.
- Investigators must proactively address ethical and legal issues when planning research involving human biospecimens.
- Recommendations focus on informed consent, risk mitigation, and compliance with evolving regulations for returning individual research results.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
91
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
91
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
336
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
336

