[The patient in clinical research: disposable guinea pig or involved actor?]

The request for informed consent to join a clinical trial often creates mistrust and hesitation in the patient who should be enrolled. In our study, we evaluated the reasons for refusing to participate in a clinical trial.

In the last 10 years of cardiovascular clinical research, we asked an informed consent to 2586 patients for intervention studies. Overall, 59% agreed to join clinical trials, 40% refused. The 1% initially accepted and then withdrew the consent. Those who refused were more frequently women, relatively younger (mean age 62 ± 5 vs 74 ± 9 years) and had a higher level of education and income. We asked all these patients who refused to answer a brief questionnaire about the reasons for rejection.

Of 1031 patients, 629 (61%), accepted to answer the interview; 176 (28%) answered they refused on relatives', friends' or other doctors' advices, or after Internet searches; 157 (25%) answered they did not agree about how the trials were carried out (double-blind control procedure, use of placebo); 126 (20%) did not trust official medicine; 63 (10%) could not guarantee their presence at the follow-up visits; 69 (11%) did not want to undergo additional medical examinations; 31 (5%) had previous bad research experiences (feeling like a guinea pig); 7 (about 1%) refused for other reasons.

Recruitment into clinical research studies is still a major challenge. Patients, due to a prevailing humanistic culture, are not fully aware of the importance of participation in clinical research, which is sometimes considered as exclusive economic or prestige interest. In our experience, people who refused participation in the trials were younger, with a high level of education and income, more frequently women. The researcher's task is to motivate the patient by emphasizing that participating in a study means being the actors of a treatment choice and that one is a guinea pig when taking untested therapies.