Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
10.2K
A diffusion model analysis of target detection in near-threshold visual search
Elaine A Corbett1, Philip L Smith2
1The University of Melbourne, Australia; Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Cognitive Psychology
|March 24, 2020
Summary
People accumulate visual search evidence separately for each item, not pooled together. Target evidence quality improves with contrast, suggesting preferential resource allocation in visual search.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Distinguishing between competing models of visual search is challenging due to similar accuracy predictions.
- Understanding how evidence is combined across locations and how evidence quality varies is crucial for visual search research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate between parallel and pooled evidence accumulation models in visual search.
- To investigate how evidence quality varies with stimulus type and contrast.
- To explore the role of attentional resource allocation in visual search.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the diffusion model to analyze response times and accuracy data.
- Conducted four near-threshold visual search tasks.
- Examined asymmetries in response-time distributions between target-present and target-absent trials.
Main Results:
- Evidence accumulation occurred in parallel for individual stimuli, not pooled into a single decision.
- Evidence quality for targets significantly improved with increasing contrast compared to non-targets.
- A fixed-capacity memory system, with preferential resource allocation to targets, explained the observed pattern.
Conclusions:
- Parallel evidence accumulation better explains visual search performance than pooled models.
- Visual search systems prioritize targets, allocating resources preferentially, especially at higher contrasts.
- Task heterogeneity can reduce the efficiency of preattentive filtering, impacting search asymmetry.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Color Vision
1.2K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.2K

