Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Comparative study on biodegradation and biocompatibility of multichannel calcium phosphate based bone substitutes
Hoe-Jin Kang1, Preeti Makkar2, Andrew R Padalhin2
1Department of Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, South Korea.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to fabricate multichannel biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bone substitutes and compare their long-term biodegradation and bone regeneration potentials. Multi-channel BCP and TCP scaffolds were fabricated by multi-pass extrusion process. Both scaffolds were cylindrical with a diameter of 1-mm, a length of 1-mm, and seven interconnected channels. Morphology, chemical composition, phase, porosity, compressive strength, ion release behavior, and in-vitro biocompatibility of both scaffolds were studied. In-vivo biodegradation and bone regeneration efficacies of BCP and TCP were also evaluated using a rabbit model for 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. BCP exhibited superior compressive strength compared to TCP scaffold. TCP showed higher release of both calcium ions and phosphorous ions than BCP in SBF solution. Both scaffolds showed excellent in-vitro biocompatibility and upregulated the expression of osteogenic markers of MC3T3-E1 cells. In-vivo studies revealed that both cylindrical TCP and BCP scaffolds were osteoconductive and supported new bone formation. Micro-CT data showed that the bone-regeneration efficacy of TCP was higher at one month and at six months after implantation. Histological examination confirmed that TCP degraded faster and had better bone regeneration than BCP after 6 months.

