Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

A Method for Measuring RNA N6-methyladenosine Modifications in Cells and Tissues
Published on: December 5, 2016
No evidence for DNA N 6-methyladenine in mammals
Karolos Douvlataniotis1, Maike Bensberg1, Antonio Lentini1
1Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract:
N 6-methyladenine (6mdA) is a widespread DNA modification in bacteria. More recently, 6mdA has also been characterized in mammalian DNA. However, measurements of 6mdA abundance and profiles are often very dissimilar between studies, even when performed on DNA from identical mammalian cell types. Using comprehensive bioinformatics analyses of published data and novel experimental approaches, we reveal that efforts to assay 6mdA in mammals have been severely compromised by bacterial contamination, RNA contamination, technological limitations, and antibody nonspecificity. These complications render 6mdA an exceptionally problematic DNA modification to study and have resulted in erroneous detection of 6mdA in several mammalian systems. Together, our results strongly imply that the evidence published to date is not sufficient to support the presence of 6mdA in mammals.
Insights
N6-methyladenine (6mdA) is a DNA modification found in bacteria. Recent studies claiming its presence in mammals are flawed due to contamination and technical issues, suggesting 6mdA is not present in mammalian DNA.
Area of Science:
- Epigenetics
- Molecular Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- N6-methyladenine (6mdA) is a known DNA modification in bacteria.
- Recent research has suggested the presence of 6mdA in mammalian DNA, but findings are inconsistent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the evidence for 6mdA in mammalian DNA.
- To identify the reasons for discrepancies in reported 6mdA measurements.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of existing data.
- Novel experimental approaches to assay 6mdA.
- Evaluation of potential sources of error including contamination and antibody specificity.
Main Results:
- Discrepancies in 6mdA abundance and profiles across studies are significant.
- Bacterial and RNA contamination compromise mammalian DNA assays.
- Technological limitations and antibody non-specificity lead to erroneous 6mdA detection.
Conclusions:
- Current methods for detecting 6mdA in mammals are severely compromised.
- Published evidence is insufficient to support the presence of 6mdA in mammalian systems.
- Further research requires rigorous validation to avoid common pitfalls.
Related Concept Videos
RNA Editing
RNA Stability
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics
Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes

