Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: September 16, 2017
MRI of Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction Edema: ADC Quantification versus T1 and T2 Mapping
Kevin Moulin1, Magalie Viallon1, William Romero1
1From the Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, CREATIS, Saint-Etienne, France (K.M., M.V., W.R., A.C., P.C.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne, CREATIS UMR 5020, INSERM U1206, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42000 Saint Etienne Cedex, France (M.V., P.C.); Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM 1407, Lyon, France (N.M.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Saint Etienne, Université Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France (K.I.).
Abstract:
Background After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), reperfusion injury is associated with microvascular lesions and myocardial edema. Purpose To evaluate the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification compared with T1 and T2 values in the detection of acute myocardial injury. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from June 2016 to November 2018, participants without a history of heart failure or cardiomyopathy were enrolled after undergoing reperfusion for their first AMI. Quantitative T1 and T2 mapping were performed with a 1.5-T MRI scanner and compared with a fast free-breathing acquisition technique for ADC mapping (approximate duration, 3 minutes; five slices; spin-echo cardiac diffusion acquisition; b values, 0 and 200 sec/mm2; six diffusion-encoding directions; five repetitions). Quantitative ADC and unenhanced T1 and T2 values were compared in infarct, border, and remote regions by using Welch analysis of variance with Games-Howell post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Results Thirty-four participants with AMI underwent MRI an average of 5 days ± 1.9 (standard deviation) after reperfusion. Mean ADC was markedly high in the infarcted regions (2.32 × 10-3 mm2/sec; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28, 2.36) and moderately high in the border regions (1.91 ×10-3 mm2/sec; 95% CI: 1.89, 1.94; P < .001). In remote regions, mean ADC (1.62 ×10-3 mm2/sec; 95% CI: 1.59, 1.64) was comparable to that measured in vivo in healthy volunteers. Within the same regions of interest, although the measures showed similar trends in infarct and remote regions for T1 (mean, 1332 mec [95% CI: 1296, 1368] vs 1045 msec [95% CI: 1034, 1056]; P < .001) and T2 (72 msec [95% CI: 69, 75] vs 50 msec [95% CI: 49, 51]; P < .001), the magnitude of the differences among regions was greater when using ADC. Normalized signal differences between infarct and remote regions showed that diffusion-weighted MRI depicted edema 5.1 (P < .001) and 3.5 (P < .001) times greater than did T1 and T2 maps, respectively. Conclusion Multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted images could be acquired in those with acute myocardial injury. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient mapping showed greater differences among remote regions and lesions than did T1 or T2 mapping. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Lloyd and Farris in this issue.
Insights
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping effectively detects acute myocardial injury after reperfusion, showing greater differences in edema than T1 and T2 mapping. This technique enables multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute myocardial injury.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) involves microvascular damage and myocardial edema.
- Accurate detection of acute myocardial injury is crucial for patient management and prognosis.
- Traditional MRI sequences may not fully capture the extent of edema and tissue changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification in detecting acute myocardial injury.
- To compare the performance of ADC mapping against T1 and T2 mapping in identifying infarct-related edema.
- To evaluate the feasibility of rapid, multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted imaging in AMI patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 34 patients with first AMI undergoing reperfusion.
- Quantitative T1, T2, and fast free-breathing ADC mapping performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner.
- ADC and T1/T2 values compared across infarct, border, and remote myocardial regions.
Main Results:
- Mean ADC values were significantly higher in infarcted (2.32 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec) and border (1.91 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec) regions compared to remote regions (1.62 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec).
- ADC mapping demonstrated greater differences between infarct and remote regions than T1 and T2 mapping.
- Diffusion-weighted MRI detected edema 5.1 times greater than T1 maps and 3.5 times greater than T2 maps.
Conclusions:
- Multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted images can be successfully acquired in patients with acute myocardial injury.
- Quantitative ADC mapping offers superior detection of myocardial edema and tissue changes compared to T1 and T2 mapping.
- ADC quantification represents a valuable tool for evaluating acute myocardial injury and reperfusion effects.
More Related Videos
09:04In Vivo Tracking of Edema Development and Microvascular Pathology in a Model of Experimental Cerebral Malaria Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 8, 2017
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019