MRI of Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction Edema: ADC Quantification versus T1 and T2 Mapping

Kevin Moulin1, Magalie Viallon1, William Romero1

  • 1From the Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, CREATIS, Saint-Etienne, France (K.M., M.V., W.R., A.C., P.C.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne, CREATIS UMR 5020, INSERM U1206, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42000 Saint Etienne Cedex, France (M.V., P.C.); Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM 1407, Lyon, France (N.M.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Saint Etienne, Université Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France (K.I.).

Radiology
|March 26, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping effectively detects acute myocardial injury after reperfusion, showing greater differences in edema than T1 and T2 mapping. This technique enables multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute myocardial injury.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Myocardial Infarction Research

Background:

  • Reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) involves microvascular damage and myocardial edema.
  • Accurate detection of acute myocardial injury is crucial for patient management and prognosis.
  • Traditional MRI sequences may not fully capture the extent of edema and tissue changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification in detecting acute myocardial injury.
  • To compare the performance of ADC mapping against T1 and T2 mapping in identifying infarct-related edema.
  • To evaluate the feasibility of rapid, multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted imaging in AMI patients.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study involving 34 patients with first AMI undergoing reperfusion.
  • Quantitative T1, T2, and fast free-breathing ADC mapping performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner.
  • ADC and T1/T2 values compared across infarct, border, and remote myocardial regions.

Main Results:

  • Mean ADC values were significantly higher in infarcted (2.32 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec) and border (1.91 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec) regions compared to remote regions (1.62 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec).
  • ADC mapping demonstrated greater differences between infarct and remote regions than T1 and T2 mapping.
  • Diffusion-weighted MRI detected edema 5.1 times greater than T1 maps and 3.5 times greater than T2 maps.

Conclusions:

  • Multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted images can be successfully acquired in patients with acute myocardial injury.
  • Quantitative ADC mapping offers superior detection of myocardial edema and tissue changes compared to T1 and T2 mapping.
  • ADC quantification represents a valuable tool for evaluating acute myocardial injury and reperfusion effects.