[Suprapubic tube drainage versus transurethral catheterization after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A...

To compare the effectiveness and safety of suprapubic tube drainage (SPT) with those of transurethral catheterization (TUC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and China Biology Medicine Disc from their inception to December 2017 for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of SPT and TUC after RARP. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, followed by a meta-analysis with the RevMan 5.3 software.

Ten studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis, involving 1 248 cases of RARP, 482 in the SPT group and the other 766 in the TUC group. The severity of postoperative penile pain was significantly lower in the SPT than in the TUC group (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.80, P = 0.0002), but no statistically significant differences were shown between the two groups in the overall pain severity at 1－3 days (［MD = －0.26, 95% CI: －1.34 to 0.83, P = 0.64］ and 6－7 days postoperatively (［MD = －0.50, 95% CI: －1.54 to 0.54, P=0.34］, urinary incontinence (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.15, P = 0.23), bacteriuria (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.97, P = 0.42), bladder neck contracture (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.53, P = 0.45), urethral stricture (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.08 to 20.7, P = 0.84), anastomotic stricture (RR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.79, P = 0.15), or urinary retention (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.00, P = 0.85).

SPT after RARP is associated with a lower severity of postoperative penile pain than TUC, but there are no statistically significant differences between the two strategies in other parameters. This conclusion, however, has to be further supported by more higher-quality randomized controlled trials.