Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025
Microfluidics in Assessing Platelet Function
Published on: November 8, 2024
Identification of injury and shock driven effects on ex vivo platelet aggregometry: A cautionary tale of phenotyping
Nichole E Starr1, Zachary A Matthay, Alexander T Fields
1From the Department of Surgery (N.E.S., Z.A.M., A.T.F., B.N.-G., R.A.C., L.Z.K.), Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California; and Department of Surgery (M.J.C.), Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Background:
Platelet behavior in trauma-induced coagulopathy is poorly understood. Injured patients have impaired platelet aggregation (dysfunction) in ex vivo agonist-stimulated platelet aggregometry (PA). However, PA assumes that platelets are inactivated before ex vivo stimulated aggregation, which may be altered by injury. We hypothesized that following trauma, platelet aggregation (area under the curve) is decreased regardless of injury burden, but that (1) minor injury is associated with an increased baseline electrical impedance, characteristic of a functional platelet phenotype (platelets that activate in response to injury), and that (2) severe injury is not associated with an increased baseline electrical impedance, characteristic of a dysfunctional phenotype (platelets that do not activate well in response to injury) compared with healthy controls.
Methods:
Blood from 458 trauma patients and 30 healthy donors was collected for PA. Baseline electrical impedance (Ω); platelet aggregation stimulated by adenosine diphosphate, collagen, thrombin, and arachidonic acid; and rotational thromboelastometry were measured. Multivariate regression was performed to identify associations of PA measures with blood transfusion.
Results:
Compared with healthy controls, injured patients had impaired platelet aggregation in response to ex vivo stimulation, regardless of injury burden. However, minorly injured patients had increased endogenous platelet activation (baseline electrical impedance, Ω: with shock, p = 0.012; without shock, p = 0.084), but severely injured patients did not have significant increases in endogenous platelet activation (baseline electrical impedance, Ω: with shock, p = 0.86; without shock, p = 0.37). For every 10 Ω increase in baseline electrical impedance, there was an 8% decrease in units of blood transfused in the first 24 h (-0.08; confidence interval, -0.14 to -0.02; p = 0.015).
Conclusion:
Injury and shock confer differential patterns of platelet aggregation in PA. Minor injury overestimates the presence of platelet dysfunction, while severe injury induces a truly dysfunctional phenotype-platelets that do not activate nor aggregate appropriately after injury. This is consequential in improving accurate phenotyping of postinjury platelet behavior for platelet-based therapeutics.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic, level IV.
