Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
12.4K
How Should Organizations Respond to Repeated Noncompliance by Prominent Researchers?
1Senior research scientist at the McGuire Research Institute in Richmond, Virginia.
AMA Journal of Ethics
|March 30, 2020
Summary
A researcher repeatedly violated study protocols, and institutions failed to act. The university should report noncompliance and create a remedial action plan for the researcher.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Research Ethics
- Clinical Trial Compliance
- Research Integrity
Background:
- Persistent protocol deviations by a prominent researcher were inadequately addressed by institutional review boards and university leadership.
- Failure to act on repeated noncompliance poses risks to research integrity and participant safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze a case of ongoing research misconduct and institutional oversight failure.
- To advocate for robust institutional responses to researcher noncompliance.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis of a specific research noncompliance incident.
- Review of federal regulations and institutional responsibilities regarding human research protections.
Main Results:
- The institution failed to implement adequate corrective actions despite repeated protocol deviations.
- Reporting noncompliance to the Office for Human Research Protections is a regulatory requirement.
Conclusions:
- Universities must move beyond mere reporting and implement concrete remedial action plans.
- Effective oversight requires proactive institutional strategies to ensure research compliance and ethical conduct.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:08Obedience
35.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.1K
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.1K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.1K
01:56Ethics in Research
25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
01:52Persuasion Strategies
42.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.9K
00:52Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.4K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.4K