Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025
Testing of all Six Semicircular Canals with Video Head Impulse Test Systems
Published on: April 18, 2019
Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults,
Amanda I Rodriguez1,2, Elizabeth Marler3, Denis Fitzpatrick1
1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha.
Objective:
To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: the relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected.
Study Design:
Prospective study.
Setting:
Tertiary referral center.
Patients:
Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits.
Interventions:
All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre- and post-testing.
Main Outcome Measures:
IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-to-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed.
Results:
VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses.
Conclusions:
Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.
More Related Videos
10:12Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: May 23, 2013
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025