Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Torts II01:13

Torts II

829
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
829
Torts III01:26

Torts III

923
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
923
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

99
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
99
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

7.1K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Arrayed single-gene perturbations identify drivers of human anterior neural tube closure.

eLife·2026
Same author

Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Isolating fast and slow flows in three-dimensional fluid dynamics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dopaminergic expression and the regulation of foraging in response to water stress.

Journal of insect physiology·2026
Same author

Improved performance and design of a low-cost laparoscope to enable laparoscopic surgery in low-income countries.

Biophotonics discovery·2026
Same author

A pro-carcinogenic bacterial toxin binds claudin-4 to cleave E-cadherin.

Nature·2026
Same journal

A Commentary on Ethics Case Reflections as an Ethics laboratory in Clinical Practice.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

From Cyberchondria to Spatial Anxiety: How Much Should I Worry About My Well-Being?

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

Moral Considerations of Patient Participation in Moral Case Deliberation: An Explorative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals, (Parents of) Patients and Facilitators.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

On the Formation of Professional Identity in Clinical Ethics Consultation: Future or Illusion?

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

Community Input on NRP: Establishing Ethical Guidelines for Normothermic Regional Perfusion Through Community and Professional Engagement.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

A Survey of Ethics Review Committees in New York State Hospitals: Key Findings and Lessons.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K

Subsequent Consent and Blameworthiness.

Jason Chen1

  • 1Center for Bioethics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. jasonchen@gmx.us.

HEC Forum : an Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues
|March 31, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians should obtain informed consent before medical procedures. Relying on patient consent after an intervention is risky and disrespectful, even if it retroactively justifies the act.

Keywords:
BlameworthinessIrresponsible behaviorPrior consentSubsequent consentUnreasonable risk

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.9K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.9K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • Informed consent is typically required before medical interventions to ensure moral permissibility.
  • The necessity of consent being obtained *prior* to an intervention is a subject of ongoing debate.
  • Some scholars propose that subsequent consent, given after a procedure, can also legitimize a physician's actions retroactively.

Observation:

  • This paper examines the ethical implications of relying on subsequent consent in medical practice.
  • It considers scenarios where a physician performs an intervention and seeks post-procedure consent for justification.
  • The core issue is whether retroactive justification through consent is ethically sound when prior consent was feasible.

Findings:

  • Even if subsequent consent can morally justify a medical intervention, physicians are blameworthy for relying on it when prior consent was possible.
  • Physicians who depend on subsequent consent are essentially "banking" on a future justification for their actions.
  • This practice exposes patients to unreasonable risks of disrespect and violation of autonomy.

Implications:

  • Physicians must prioritize obtaining informed consent before medical interventions whenever feasible.
  • Relying on post-intervention consent, even if granted, constitutes ethically questionable practice due to inherent risks.
  • This ethical stance reinforces the importance of patient autonomy and proactive consent in healthcare.