Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

8.0K
Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
8.0K
Proteomics01:33

Proteomics

9.2K
A proteome is the entire set of proteins that a cell type produces. We can study proteomes using the knowledge of genomes because genes code for mRNAs, and the mRNAs encode proteins. Although mRNA analysis is a step in the right direction, not all mRNAs are translated into proteins.
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
9.2K
Deconvolution01:20

Deconvolution

494
Deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, is the process of extracting the impulse response from known input and output signals. This technique is vital in scenarios where the system's characteristics are unknown, and they must be inferred from the observable signals.
Deconvolution involves several mathematical techniques to derive the impulse response. One common approach is polynomial division. In this method, the input and output sequences are treated as coefficients of...
494

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In situ vaccination, low-dose targeted radionuclide therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibition eradicate poorly immunogenic metastatic tumors in murine cancer models.

Cancer immunology research·2026
Same author

Integrated Multiomics Enabled by Sequential Extraction for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Small Extracellular Vesicles.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Leveraging nanoparticle protein corona to advance plasma proteome profiling.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Consensus statement on mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of cardiac tissue.

Nature cardiovascular research·2026
Same author

In-depth Characterization of Photo-Stressed Antibody-Drug Conjugates by Mass Spectrometry.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same author

A Head and Neck Cancer Patient-Specific Microphysiological System for Predicting Response to Chemoradiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.6K

Enhancing Top-Down Proteomics Data Analysis by Combining Deconvolution Results through a Machine Learning Strategy.

Sean J McIlwain, Zhijie Wu, Molly Wetzel

    Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
    |April 1, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    A new machine learning strategy combines results from multiple algorithms to improve proteoform identification in top-down mass spectrometry (MS). This approach enhances accuracy and confidence in detecting true positive protein signals, outperforming individual deconvolution methods.

    Keywords:
    machine learning ensembletop-down mass spectrometry

    More Related Videos

    Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    10:05

    Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    Published on: October 24, 2018

    9.9K
    Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
    10:37

    Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

    Published on: November 15, 2017

    12.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

    Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
    09:47

    Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    1.6K
    Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    10:05

    Large-scale Top-down Proteomics Using Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Tandem Mass Spectrometry

    Published on: October 24, 2018

    9.9K
    Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
    10:37

    Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

    Published on: November 15, 2017

    12.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Proteomics
    • Computational Biology
    • Biochemistry

    Background:

    • Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) is crucial for characterizing proteoforms, but data analysis is complex.
    • Deconvoluting isotopic distributions is a critical, yet challenging, step in top-down MS data processing.
    • Existing deconvolution algorithms yield varied accuracy, impacting proteoform identification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a machine learning strategy for integrating and improving deconvolution results in top-down MS.
    • To enhance the accuracy and confidence of proteoform identification through improved peak detection.

    Main Methods:

    • A machine learning strategy was designed to process and combine peak lists from multiple deconvolution algorithms (THRASH, TopFD, MS-Deconv, SNAP).
    • Ensemble methods, including a random forest algorithm, were employed to generate consensus peak lists.
    • Performance was evaluated using recall and precision values.

    Main Results:

    • The random forest machine learning algorithm achieved a recall of 0.60 and a precision of 0.78.
    • This consensus approach significantly outperformed the best single deconvolution algorithm (recall 0.47, precision 0.58).
    • The strategy improved the detection of true positive peaks and filtering of false positives.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed machine learning strategy effectively enhances proteoform identification accuracy and confidence in top-down proteomics.
    • This method shows significant promise for high-throughput proteoform analysis.
    • Integrating multiple deconvolution algorithms via machine learning offers a robust solution for complex MS data interpretation.