Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Buffer Effectiveness02:19

Buffer Effectiveness

Buffer solutions do not have an unlimited capacity to keep the pH relatively constant . Instead, the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH relies on the presence of appreciable amounts of its conjugate weak acid-base pair. When enough strong acid or base is added to substantially lower the concentration of either member of the buffer pair, the buffering action within the solution is compromised.
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence against stimulus-effect priming as the source of modality pairing effects in task switching.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Explaining Brain-Behavior Relations: Inhibitory Control as an Intermediate Phenotype Between the N2 ERP and the Externalizing Spectrum in Childhood.

Research on child and adolescent psychopathology·2024
Same author

Comparing partial repetition costs in two- and four-choice tasks: Evidence for abstract relational codes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2023
Same author

The Role of Effector-Specific Task Representations in Voluntary Task Switching.

Journal of cognition·2023
Same author

Response-repetition costs reflect changes to the representation of an action.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Multiple Routes to Control in the Prime-Target Task: Congruence Sequence Effects Emerge Due to Modulation of Irrelevant Prime Activity and Utilization of Temporal Order Information.

Journal of cognition·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.5K

Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.

Jonathan Schacherer1, Eliot Hazeltine1

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Dual-task costs are influenced by how task stimuli and sensory feedback align. Modality-compatible action effects reduce dual-task interference, improving performance compared to incompatible effects.

More Related Videos

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.5K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-task costs, the performance decrement when performing two tasks simultaneously, are often attributed to central processing interference.
  • Previous research suggests modality pairings (e.g., visual-vocal vs. auditory-manual) impact dual-task costs.
  • The role of sensory consequences of actions (action effects) in modulating these costs is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of modality compatibility between stimuli and experimentally induced action effects on dual-task costs.
  • To determine if modality-compatible action effects reduce interference compared to modality-incompatible effects.
  • To explore whether modality-compatible action effects offer an advantage over conditions with no induced action effects.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted manipulating the modality compatibility between task stimuli and induced action effects.
  • Participants performed dual tasks with varying stimulus-action effect pairings (modality-compatible vs. modality-incompatible).
  • Dual-task costs were measured by comparing performance on dual tasks versus single tasks.

Main Results:

  • Dual-task costs were significantly smaller when action effects were modality-compatible with the stimuli compared to when they were modality-incompatible.
  • Modality-compatible action effects resulted in an advantage over conditions where no action effects were experimentally induced.
  • These findings indicate that the relationship between stimuli and action effects impacts central processing and response selection.

Conclusions:

  • The modality relationship between stimuli and action effects is a significant factor contributing to dual-task costs.
  • Modality-compatible action effects can mitigate cognitive interference during dual-task performance.
  • Post-response sensory events, specifically action effects, play a crucial role in modulating response selection processes, extending our understanding of cognitive control.