Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Femoral derotational osteotomies for version abnormalities: a mean ten-year follow-up.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Bone transport in the management of fracture-related infection: current concepts and innovations.

Journal of bone and joint infection·2026
Same author

Introduction of the axial malalignment test: a classification system for torsional malalignment in the lower limb.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B·2026
Same author

Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

JBJS essential surgical techniques·2026
Same author

Tibial Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nail.

JBJS essential surgical techniques·2026
Same author

Open Tibial Fractures Part 2: A Narrative Review of Definitive Treatment and Potential Applicability to the Southern African Context.

Orthopedic research and reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.4K

Osseointegration for Amputees: Current Implants, Techniques, and Future Directions.

Jason Shih Hoellwarth1, Kevin Tetsworth2, S Robert Rozbruch3

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

JBJS Reviews
|April 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Osseointegrated prostheses offer amputees improved mobility and satisfaction compared to traditional options. Risks like infection are manageable, and these implants can integrate with advanced prosthetic technologies.

More Related Videos

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.8K
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.4K
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.8K
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Rehabilitation medicine
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Traditional socket prostheses present limitations for amputees.
  • Osseointegrated prostheses offer an alternative rehabilitation approach.
  • Various implant designs, surgical techniques, and protocols exist.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the efficacy and safety of osseointegrated prostheses.
  • To compare osseointegrated prostheses with traditional socket prostheses.
  • To discuss the potential of advanced prosthetic integration.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of osseointegrated implant systems.
  • Analysis of surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols.
  • Evaluation of complication rates and patient outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Osseointegrated prostheses demonstrate enhanced mobility, satisfaction, and usage.
  • Key risks, including infection and periprosthetic fracture, are infrequent and manageable.
  • Integration with advanced sensory and motor prostheses is feasible.

Conclusions:

  • Osseointegrated prostheses represent a viable and effective rehabilitation option for amputees.
  • The benefits of improved function and patient satisfaction outweigh the manageable risks.
  • Future advancements include integration with sophisticated prosthetic technologies.