Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
Published on: March 14, 2013
Comparing Targeted vs. Untargeted MS2 Data-Dependent Acquisition for Peak Annotation in LC-MS Metabolomics
Isabel Ten-Doménech1, Teresa Martínez-Sena2, Marta Moreno-Torres2
1Neonatal Research Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
One of the most widely used strategies for metabolite annotation in untargeted LCMS is based on the analysis of MSn spectra acquired using data-dependent acquisition (DDA), where precursor ions are sequentially selected from MS scans based on user-selected criteria. However, the number of MSn spectra that can be acquired during a chromatogram is limited and a trade-off between analytical speed, sensitivity and coverage must be ensured. In this research, we compare four different strategies for automated MS2 DDA, which can be easily implemented in the frame of standard QA/QC workflows for untargeted LC-MS. These strategies consist of (i) DDA in the MS working range; (ii) iterated DDA split into several m/z intervals; (iii) dynamic iterated DDA of (pre)selected potentially informative features; and (iv) dynamic iterated DDA of (pre)annotated metabolic features using a reference database. Their performance was assessed using the analysis of human milk samples as model example by comparing the percentage of LC-MS features selected as the precursor ion for MS2, the number, and class of annotated features, the speed and confidence of feature annotation, and the number of LC runs required.
Related Concept Videos
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
Tandem Mass Spectrometry

