Evaluation of border movement of the mandible before and after orthognathic surgery using a kinesiograph

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in the mandibular border movement between class II and class III jaw deformity patients before and after orthognathic surgery, by using the same device.

and Methods: Eighty one patients (28 in class II and 53 in class III) who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with Le Fort I osteotomy using absorbable plate fixation and 27 controls with normal occlusion were enrolled. Mandibular border movement (observed using a kinesiograph) was recorded with a mandibular movement measure system (K7) before surgery, and at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Time-course changes of 5 components of the mandibular border movement (MVO: Maximum vertical opening, CO to MAP: Maximum antero-posterior movement from centric occlusion, MLDL: maximum lateral deviation left, MLDR: maximum lateral deviation right, CO to MO: centric occlusion to maximum opening) were compared between classes II, III and controls statistically. The relationship between lateral cephalometric measurements and the components of mandibular border movement was also examined.

There was a significant difference in CO to MAP (P = 0.0025) and CO to MO (P < 0.0001) between class II and class III in the time-course change. In class III, mean and standard deviation of MVO were 44.5 ± 6.7 mm before surgery and 39.8 ± 6.8 mm after 1 year. Mean and standard deviation of CO to MAP were 25.2 ± 6.8 mm before surgery and 21.5 ± 7.9 mm after 1 year. Mean and standard deviation of CO to MO were 53.4 ± 9.0 mm before surgery and 47.3 ± 8.4 mm after 1 year. In class II, mean and standard deviation of MVO were 38.8 ± 5.8 mm before surgery and 36.2 ± 7.4 mm after 1 year. Mean and standard deviation of CO to MAP were 18.0 ± 6.3 mm before surgery and 17.8 ± 7.4 mm after 1 year. Mean and standard deviation of CO to MO were 43.1 ± 7.5 mm before surgery and 39.6 ± 10.5 mm after 1 year. In MVO, CO to MAP and CO to MO, the values after 1 year did not significantly reach the pre-operative values in class III (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0007 and P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference between pre-operation and after 1 year in class II. In CO to MO, class II (mean and standard deviation 39.6 ± 10.5 mm) and class III (mean and standard deviation 47.3 ± 8.4 mm) still remained smaller values than control (mean and standard deviation 52.7 ± 9.2 mm) after 1 year (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0095).

This study suggests that bi-maxillary surgery can have more influence on the reduction in the range of mandibular border movement including vertical or antero-posterior motion than lateral deviation motion, in both groups. The difference in the time-course change in the mandibular border movement between the groups might depend more on the mandibular length than on the movement direction of the mandible by surgery such as advancement or setback.