Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Management of antithrombotic therapy in gray areas of venous thromboembolism: a Delphi consensus panel
Giovanni Barillari1, Cristiano Bortoluzzi2, Mauro Giorgi3
1Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Insights
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). A Delphi consensus addressed uncertainties in DOAC use for VTE patients in real-world scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are established treatments for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
- Clinical trials do not fully cover all real-world VTE patient scenarios, leading to uncertainty in DOAC application.
- Expert consensus is needed to guide DOAC use in complex VTE cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a Delphi Consensus among Italian physicians on the use of DOACs in specific VTE patient populations and clinical situations.
- To address uncertainties regarding DOAC efficacy, safety, and optimal management strategies in VTE.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for real-world DOAC application in VTE.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi Consensus process involving 46 Italian physicians from various specialties (cardiology, internal medicine, angiology, oncology, hematology, geriatrics).
- Physicians rated agreement on 7 key topics related to DOAC use in VTE using a 5-point Likert scale.
- Consensus was defined as agreement of ≥66% among respondents.
Main Results:
- The consensus addressed DOAC superiority over VKAs, management of intermediate-risk PE, DVT treatment, DOACs in cancer patients, reversal agent use, low-dose DOAC safety, and long-term therapy.
- Detailed results for each of the seven topics were achieved through the Delphi process.
- The consensus provides expert opinion on several debated aspects of DOAC therapy in VTE.
Conclusions:
- The Delphi Consensus offers guidance on the application of DOACs in various real-world VTE scenarios not fully covered by clinical trials.
- Expert agreement was reached on key aspects of DOAC use, including specific patient populations and treatment durations.
- This consensus aims to standardize and optimize DOAC therapy for VTE patients in clinical practice.
Abstract:
For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOACs' use in some clinical scenarios that are not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in VTE patients. The consensus dealt with seven main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) therapeutic options for patients with intermediate risk PE; (3) therapeutic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (4) DOACs' role in oncological patients with VTE; (5) role of the reversal agent; (6) safety of low doses of DOACs in VTE patients; (7) DOACs long-term therapy (more than 12 months) in VTE patients; Forty-six physicians (cardiologists, internists, angiologists, oncologists, hematologists, and geriatricians) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a five-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered as disagreement, while votes 3-5 as agreement. For each statement an agreement of ≥ 66% among the respondents was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

