Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving01:18

Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving

389
To calculate the flow rate for a trapezoidal channel, first, identify the bottom width, side slope, and flow depth of the channel. The cross-sectional area (A) corresponding to the depth of flow (y), channel bottom width (B), and side slope (θ) is determined by:Next, calculate the wetted perimeter, which includes the bottom width and the sloped side lengths in contact with the water. Using the values of the cross-sectional area and the wetted perimeter, determine the hydraulic radius by...
389
Uniform Depth Channel Flow01:27

Uniform Depth Channel Flow

468
Uniform depth channel flow keeps fluid depth consistent along channels such as irrigation canals. In natural channels, such as rivers, approximate uniform flow is often assumed. This condition occurs when the channel’s bottom slope matches the energy slope, balancing potential energy lost from gravity with head loss due to shear stress. This balance prevents depth changes along the channel length, resulting in a steady, uniform flow.Uniform flow in open channels with a constant cross-section...
468
Rapidly Varying Flow01:24

Rapidly Varying Flow

345
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
345
Gradually Varying Flow01:29

Gradually Varying Flow

332
Gradually varying flow (GVF) in open channels describes situations where water depth changes slowly along the channel due to factors like non-uniform bed slope, channel shape variations, or obstructions. This flow type occurs when the depth adjusts gradually to balance gravitational forces, shear forces, and energy requirements, resulting in a low rate of depth change.Characteristics of Gradually Varying FlowGVF is commonly observed in natural streams, rivers, and canals, where flow depth...
332

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A single-center retrospective study of a decade-long experience in managing pediatric lymphatic malformation.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

Gastrointestinal Fate and Receptor-Mediated Mechanism of GPSGPQGSR, an Intestinal Barrier-Protective Collagen Peptide from ALASKA Pollock Skin.

Marine drugs·2026
Same author

Lipoblastoma of the head and neck in children: a single-institution study.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

Dehydroacetic acid disrupts cold adaptation and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas lundensis: A targeted strategy for enhancing microbiological safety of refrigerated poultry.

Food microbiology·2026
Same author

A national multicenter analysis of hospitalization admission records for lymphatic malformation in China from 2016 to 2023.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

Activation of the impaired NAMPT/SIRT7/SOD2 axis restores alveolar progenitor cell renewal in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA
09:22

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA

Published on: October 31, 2011

13.4K

Using Deep Learning to Forecast Maritime Vessel Flows.

Xiangyu Zhou1,2, Zhengjiang Liu1, Fengwu Wang1

  • 1Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Accurate vessel flow forecasting using deep learning, including CNN and LSTM models, improves maritime traffic management. The hybrid Bidirectional LSTM-CNN model offers the best performance for predicting vessel movements.

Keywords:
deep learningintelligent transportation systemsmaritime vessel flows

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA
09:22

Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA

Published on: October 31, 2011

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Maritime intelligent transportation systems
  • Deep learning applications in logistics
  • Traffic flow prediction modeling

Background:

  • Real-time maritime traffic data is crucial for efficient transportation systems.
  • Accurate vessel flow information aids in congestion mitigation, emission reduction, and safety enhancement.
  • Current methods may not fully capture the complexities of maritime traffic patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate deep learning models for forecasting maritime vessel inflow and outflow.
  • To compare the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a hybrid Bidirectional LSTM-CNN (BDLSTM-CNN) model.
  • To validate the effectiveness of these models using real-world Automatic Identification System (AIS) data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of three deep learning architectures: CNN, LSTM, and BDLSTM-CNN.
  • Spatial discretization of maritime regions into M x N grids for localized forecasting.
  • Training and testing models on historical AIS data from Singaporean waters.

Main Results:

  • All proposed deep learning models significantly outperformed conventional forecasting methods.
  • The BDLSTM-CNN hybrid model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy.
  • Performance was evaluated using standard metrics: Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning approaches, particularly the BDLSTM-CNN, are highly effective for maritime vessel flow forecasting.
  • The study validates the potential of these advanced models for enhancing maritime traffic management.
  • Accurate forecasting can lead to improved operational efficiency and safety in maritime domains.